> Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 10:05:59 +0100
> From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
>
>>> Like a METS wrapper around record + metadata? :)
>>> http://www.loc.gov/mets/
>>
>> Will METS then be the requested record schema, independend of what is
>> in it?
>
> Yes, you'd request METS but currently you can't request any of the
> sub-schemas.

What's to stop us defining a (potentially infinite) group of new
schemas, each identified by a URI of the form
        http://loc.gov/sru/mets/<path-to-some-other-schema>
each of which represents METS records using that nominated schema?

 _/|_    ___________________________________________________________________
/o ) \/  Mike Taylor  <[log in to unmask]>  http://www.miketaylor.org.uk
)_v__/\  "Good luck, everyone" -- Bob the Angry Flower after the WTC
         disaster.  See http://angryflower.com/septem.gif

--
Listen to free demos of soundtrack music for film, TV and radio
        http://www.pipedreaming.org.uk/soundtrack/