Bill: If you require a record in multiple recordSchemas a separate
transaction to obtain the record in each recordSchema.
Bill
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf
Of
> Robert Sanderson
> Sent: 11 August 2005 17:13
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Multiple Schemas per Request summary
>
> Rob:
> ---
> Modify recordSchema semantics to allow multiple schema
identifiers/names.
> If multiple schemas are given:
> a) The first MUST be a wrapper schema, the rest are schemas to
include.
> If the first isn't then it's an error. (Ray)
> b) If the first is not a wrapper schema, then it's a choice of schema
> (as per one of the current extensions) (Rob)
>
>
> Mike:
> ----
> Just define new identifiers for each combination of wrapper and
wrapped
> schema.
>
>
> Theo:
> ----
> Allow multiple record schemas in recordSchema but only allow a single
> wrapper schema, to be specified by the protocol. [As I understand it]
>
>
> Matthew:
> -------
> Allow compound schemas to be identified in a new nested XML structure
in
> SRW, and map that structure into a set of parameters in SRU.
>
>
> Hope I've done all the proposals justice!
>
> Rob
**************************************************************************
Experience the British Library online at www.bl.uk
Help the British Library conserve the world's knowledge. Adopt a Book. www.bl.uk/adoptabook
The Library's St Pancras site is WiFI - enabled
**************************************************************************
The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this e-mail and notify the [log in to unmask] : The contents of this e-mail must not be disclosed or copied without the sender's consent.
The statements and opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the British Library. The British Library does not take any responsibility for the views of the author.
**************************************************************************
|