Ralph:
No new identifiers for local mixes.  Local identifier for local wrapper
and some way to hint at contents in Explain.



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf
Of
> Robert Sanderson
> Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 12:13 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Multiple Schemas per Request summary
> 
> Rob:
> ---
> Modify recordSchema semantics to allow multiple schema
identifiers/names.
> If multiple schemas are given:
> a)  The first MUST be a wrapper schema, the rest are schemas to
include.
>     If the first isn't then it's an error.  (Ray)
> b)  If the first is not a wrapper schema, then it's a choice of schema
>     (as per one of the current extensions)  (Rob)
> 
> 
> Mike:
> ----
> Just define new identifiers for each combination of wrapper and
wrapped
> schema.
> 
> 
> Theo:
> ----
> Allow multiple record schemas in recordSchema but only allow a single
> wrapper schema, to be specified by the protocol.  [As I understand it]
> 
> 
> Matthew:
> -------
> Allow compound schemas to be identified in a new nested XML structure
in
> SRW, and map that structure into a set of parameters in SRU.
> 
> 
> Hope I've done all the proposals justice!
> 
> Rob