No apology needed - it was really a left-handed compliment. I have
rarely felt gear-envy recnetly until I looked at your site! But I
really don't need a tape deck that weighs as much as I do! ;-)
There is a quality of scale, too - SoundSoap 2 fills my simple needs
and budget. Algorithmix looks amazing. Have you compared it with Cedar?
On Sep 8, 2005, at 6:08 AM, Richard L. Hess wrote:
> At 02:15 AM 9/8/2005, you wrote:
>> I'd hardly call your setup "basic" Richard!
> Sorry, Lou, I was thinking in terms of picking and choosing which is
> why I said "ideas." My setup is really very basic - there's just a lot
> of it. Each machine goes to the jackfield. Each noise processor goes
> to the jackfield. The A-D/D-As go to the jackfield. Nothing is
> Your setup sounds good - but, as you say, you and I both bring many
> years of experience to using analog tape.
> Other than the APR-16, the most expensive item in my collection is the
> Algorithmix NoiseFree Pro (at least at my cost).
>> I have a PR-99, a Teac quarter track, and a Pioneer four track,
>> Protools 002R LE, and a couple of Masterlinks. Pretty basic.
>> The thing that makes it profeessional is 35 years of analog work with
>> tape. THAT is priceless...