LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  September 2005

ARSCLIST September 2005

Subject:

Field recorders

From:

Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 29 Sep 2005 19:33:43 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (55 lines)

I arrived home to the latest issue of Electronic Musician and, pertinent to
our recent thread, the cover story was all about digital field recorders.
Basically, none came out ideal and they all seem very costly given the
comments about features and sound quality. The best overall value and also
scored surprisingly well on subjective sound quality opinions was the Edirol
R-4:
http://www.edirol.com/products/info/r4.html

Edirol makes a unit, the R-1:
http://www.edirol.com/products/info/r1.html
that seems a direct competitor to the Marantz and M-Audio units we've
discussed.
It was not very favorably reviewed in the EM article, nor was the Marantz
unit.

I also did a bit of digging on the M-Audio unit and I think this may be a
piece of gear that originated in an Asian design lab and then was peddled
around for a known pro-audio company to brand and sell. A lot of MP3 players
and networking gear sold under various established brand names are done this
way. I think some of the short-comings of the M-Audio unit (low phantom
voltage, not genuine pro balanced ins and out, etc) may be due to a lack of
understanding of what constitutes pro-grade vs. a souped up piece of
consumer gear.

The Marantz unit we've discussed is a first-generation unit and I predict
they'll come out with a unit at that price point that will be superior and
address the many complaints (the EM article also noted the terrible mic
preamps but added that the Marantz unit already has a large foothold with
radio news-gathering -- even though it rated low on subjective opinions of
spoken-word recording).

I'm pretty sure Marantz and Edirol/Roland design their products in-house and
have them built either in their own Asian factories or in factories that
they have some control over. I'm not positive about the M-Audio unit, which
may be done like many pieces of commodity-priced networking gear, digital
cameras and digital music players: designed and built to a price point by a
3rd party and branded and sold by a domestic company. Given the complaints
I've read about the M-Audio unit, I bet the Avid parent executives are not
pleased. But, I should quickly add that they were ambitious in their goals
and claims and should get some credit for it.

Bottom line, for me anyway, is that I'll stick with my trusty Sony Pressman
cassette recorder until a much better digital alternative comes along at a
reasonable price point (ie under $200). Also interesting to note in that
same issue of EM is the New Products announcement of the M-Audio device
(which apparently came out too late for the comparison article) and also the
new Sony MiniDisc Pro machines. If one hears good reports about the media
and recorders being durable enough for field use a year or two down the
road, those MD Pro units may be a compelling alternative until the
solid-state memory devices get better and cheaper.

One man's opinions, YMMV, etc.

-- Tom Fine

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager