LeVan,Ralph wrote:
> Thanks, Sebastian!  I'd have spent too much time following that red
> herring!
> 
> Beats me why it doesn't like it.
Tried to test a different SRU server on one of our machines listening on 
a port <> 80. It seems your test client never reaches it.

Firewall issue?

/ Adam

> 
> Ralph 
> 
> 
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
>>On Behalf Of Sebastian Hammer
>>Sent: Monday, September 19, 2005 10:52 AM
>>To: [log in to unmask]
>>Subject: Re: SRW/U vs OpenSearch blog [tester]
>>
>>Ralph,
>>
>>The 'register=on' was generated by your app -- it's not part 
>>of the base URL.
>>
>>Please try this base URL: z3950.loc.gov:7090/voyager
>>
>>Same result,
>>
>>--Seb
>>
>>At 09:56 AM 9/19/2005 -0400, LeVan,Ralph wrote:
>>
>>>Isn't this base URL in error?
>>>http://z3950.loc.gov:7090/voyager?register=on?
>>>
>>>You can't just stick whatever parameters you want into the URL.  My 
>>>understanding of the rules was that the URL consisted of 
>>
>>host, optional 
>>
>>>port, and database.  Our parameters would follow a question 
>>
>>mark that 
>>
>>>we would provide (the question mark is not part of the 
>>
>>database name).
>>
>>>My tester is completely unprepared for a URL with a question mark 
>>>embedded in it.
>>>
>>>Ralph
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On 
>>>>Behalf Of Mike Taylor
>>>>Sent: Friday, September 16, 2005 3:39 AM
>>>>To: [log in to unmask]
>>>>Subject: Re: SRW/U vs OpenSearch blog [tester]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 18:00:55 -0400
>>>>>From: "LeVan,Ralph" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>
>>>>>Okay, I've got my tester up as a site.  Try 
>>>>>http://alcme.oclc.org/srw/SRUServerTester.html.
>>>>
>>>>Nice!  Thanks for putting this up.
>>>>
>>>>However --
>>>>
>>>>http://alcme.oclc.org/srw/test/SRUServerTester?url=http%3A%2F%
>>>>2Fz3950.loc.gov%3A7090%2Fvoyager&register=on
>>>>
>>>>      running SRU tests for baseURL: 
>>
>>http://z3950.loc.gov:7090/voyager
>>
>>>>      tests of Explain
>>>>          trying: http://z3950.loc.gov:7090/voyager
>>>>      test failed: opening URL: Connection timed out
>>>>      test failed: expected an explainResponse, but got:
>>>>      null
>>>>          trying: http://z3950.loc.gov:7090/voyager?
>>>>      test failed: opening URL: Connection timed out
>>>>      test failed: expected an explainResponse, but got:
>>>>      null
>>>>          trying: 
>>
>>http://z3950.loc.gov:7090/voyager?operation=explain
>>
>>>>      test failed: opening URL: Connection timed out
>>>>      test failed: expected an explainResponse, but got:
>>>>      null
>>>>          trying: http://z3950.loc.gov:7090/voyager?version=1.1
>>>>      test failed: opening URL: Connection timed out
>>>>      test failed: expected an explainResponse, but got:
>>>>      null
>>>>          trying:
>>>>http://z3950.loc.gov:7090/voyager?operation=explain&version=1.1
>>>>      test failed: opening URL: Connection timed out
>>>>      test failed: expected an explainResponse, but got:
>>>>      null
>>>>
>>>>      5 tests given
>>>>      5 tests failed
>>>>      problems detected!
>>>>
>>>>Not good!
>>>>
>>>> _/|_
>>>>
>>
>>___________________________________________________________________
>>
>>>>/o ) \/  Mike Taylor  <[log in to unmask]> 
>>>>http://www.miketaylor.org.uk )_v__/\  "The interpreter is 
>>
>>fairly bad 
>>
>>>>at useful error reporting and
>>>>      other such luxuries.  Just try to write bug-free code" --
>>>>      David Fletcher.
>>>>
>>
>>--
>>Sebastian Hammer, Index Data, www.indexdata.com Direct phone: 
>>(603) 209-6853 Fax: (603) 357-1813
> 
> 
>