LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  October 2005

ARSCLIST October 2005

Subject:

Seen at AES NYC

From:

Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 11 Oct 2005 08:21:29 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (61 lines)

I'm cross-posting this to the Ampex and ARSC lists since both have had
discussions recently about field recorders.

Digital solid-state recorders are definitely where news-gathering is moving.
At AES were two very interesting devices. Each may or may not be adequate
for music work, but they'd sure simplify field interviews. I'd argue the
second one, in particular, would be perfectly fine to capture a rehearsal or
club gig and could also take an unbalanced feed from a soundboard (ie a
headphones feed).

First was an omnidirectional mic with a built-in 1 gig flash recorder from
HHB (might be HBB -- I don't have the literature at this location and I get
confused which they are). That will be on sale by the end of this year. It
can record up to 48/16-bit, but their initial release did not include
44.1/16! The sales guy assured me and a lady from one of the Canadian
broadcast outfits that the final version will include CD-standard audio
since, it turns out, many broadcast plants are standardized on that format.
This one seems very much geared toward the radio reporter with a hand-held
mic. I would use it for interviews, but some insist on lav mics so it would
not be for them. Note that 1gig is it -- no removable media. There's a
reason for that, see below.

The other one that caught my eye was Nagra's new unit. It's about the size
of a microcassette recorder, but 1/3 or less the weight and no moving parts.
Runs on 2x AA batteries. Nice big screen and very easy user interface. This
unit has a stereo pair of electret mics plugged into the top. You can unplug
them and have an unbalanced stereo mic input, and next to it an unbalanced
stereo line input. No phantom power, of course, but obviously some battery
power for the standard-issue electrets. I have some experience with a
similar setup on an MD recorder and this setup captures far more audio far
better than you'd think, but the picky will not like it. Of course, on an MD
recorder the mics usually pick up transport noise, which will not be a
problem here. The user interface is clear and easy, and you can edit and
insert timing marks right in the device. Built-in 1 gig of flash memory.
Being a Nagra, it lists for $1000, which is pretty steep for what it is, but
it's built like a Nagra so it'll last in the field.

So why not removable media? Both sales people told me that 2 AA batteries
was the power the units were built for and that's not enough to power
CompactFlash for hours of recording. Plus, news departments lose removable
media and the word from on high in broadcast journalism was -- nothing a
reporter can lose, misplace or have their kids grab from their bag to use in
the digi-cam. Both of these units plug in via USB and mount right up as hard
drives for MacOS or Win2k/XP. I think the Nagra comes with some
editing/export/import software.

For my needs, the HHB unit is non-ideal and the Nagra is too expensive. But
I'm hoping someone designing a $300 unit will look at the feature sets of
these two and do one for the rest of us. I've decided the current crop of
$400 units (M-Audio/Edirol/others) are too ambitious for their price points
and could do simpler units that work better. I don't really care about the
weight/bulk of 4xAA batteries if that gives me CompactFlash, so in that way
the M-Audio and Edirol units are a better fit.

I am pretty confident that this is the way portable recording is going, so I
think the next generation of devices out in 6-12 months will offer better
form-factors and more appropriate features and interfaces, probably for less
cost. So I plan to wait and see.

-- Tom Fine

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager