LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for MODS Archives


MODS Archives

MODS Archives


MODS@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

MODS Home

MODS Home

MODS  November 2005

MODS November 2005

Subject:

Re: Citation needs. Was: alternate personal names in MODS?

From:

Suzanne Pilsk <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Metadata Object Description Schema List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 22 Nov 2005 17:07:51 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (128 lines)

I wish I could find a juicy example right this second but I can't put my
finger, mouse, hand on one.  I have the task of trying to work with
taxonomist who are trying to code citations paired with the naming of
species, etc.  This is a bear! And I would like them to resolve through some
sort of "openurl".  So does that mean we have to have DOI for each page
reference? or to the article/chapter level?

And the hierarchy of the title being cited is confusing - with things not
published even sequentially.  Volume 5 might be published BEFORE Volume 4 -
and believe you me, these scientist need that date for that named bug!

What seems to be straight forward for currently published materials doesn't
seem to fit retrospectivily.  As one poster brought up: those German series
can take on a life of their own.

I think I need some turkey and stuffing before I can begin to see the light
on how to handle (handle.net?) these things,

Suzanne
<A MODS Lurker>

Suzanne C. Pilsk
[log in to unmask]
Direct number: 
202-633-1646

Cataloging Services 
Smithsonian Institution Libraries
PO Box 37012
Natural History Building, Room 30- MRC 0154
Washington, DC 20013-7012
Unit number:
202-633-1668


>>> [log in to unmask] 11/22 4:31 PM >>>
Bruce,

The basic problem is that the names of the parts of the journal 
hierarchy don't tell you about their order. That's why the SICI standard 
(and some citation formats)  ignores what the parts are called and just 
gives the enumeration (yes, we can call it something else) as a 
highest-to-lowest list, like "4:3". Order makes a big difference in 
terms of actually identifying the part that you are citing ("3:4" is NE 
"4:3"). For journals using simple numbering, using volume/number works 
fine, but so many journals don't follow that pattern. If you have an 
issue that is called neither volume nor number, where do you put it? 
(Also, "volume/number" works only for English language journals; 
presumably you want to cite what the level is called on the cover of the 
journal so that a person looking at it can verify that they have the 
right item.)

Although my example code looks complex, it's not what I would expect 
anyone to have to code directly. Also, library systems can store 
patterns that pertain to individual journal titles, so the person keying 
can be presented with a pattern already set to be filled in based on the 
title or ISSN. For citation systems, it is probably enough for someone 
to fill in the levels and their "numbers" (which can sometimes be 
letters, months, seasons or dates) in the correct order, something like:

volume  1
part      B
number  6
date  [whatever]

And this would display nicely as: "volume 1, part B, number 6" or "v. 1, 
pt. B, no. 6" or "1(B)6" or any other number of citation formats. But if 
you haven't coded the order of the levels then things like linking (in 
the OpenURL sense) are likely to fail. So call them what you want, these 
are the data elements that are needed, and the relationship between them 
is key.

kc

Bruce D'Arcus wrote:

>On 11/22/05, Karen Coyle <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Bruce, I thought I had explained in my message why the method that you
>>suggest does not work. However, it might be better explained by someone
>>with some good, juicy examples from the reality of serials issuance.
Anyone?
>>    
>>
>
>Sorry, am rather distracted today with a ton of things, so no doubt
>missed some nuance.  I've also not come across any examples where
>"levels" are particularly meaningful in citations, so conveniently
>passed that over ;-)
>
>However, in any case, I do think we need to find a simpler example
>than your "simple" example.  One thing I have come around to over the
>past bit of time is that it's essential that our metadata models and
>formats be easier to work with for non-experts; both those who would
>create the metadata, and those who would write tools to consume it. 
>It's hard enough to convince people to even do decent DC.
>
>I realize my example is problamatic because I use the term "number"
>when we could be talking about, say, <ex:part>B</ex:part>.  But could
>you imagine achieving the same effect without having to use terms like
>"levels" or "enumerations"?  Even if different journals were to use
>"part" inconsistently, does it really matter, either for citations, or
>for finding the correct item?
>
>BTW, in RDF, one tends to takea a different tack than this approach of
>having generic metadata structures (say "enumeration"), with specific
>modifiers (a type attribute).  Instead, one would define specific
>structures, and then if you need to say that, for example, volume and
>issue are both kinds of enumerations, one would define that in the
>ontology (above the XML in effect).
>
>Bruce
>
>
>  
>

-- 
-----------------------------------
Karen Coyle / Digital Library Consultant
[log in to unmask] http://www.kcoyle.net 
ph.: 510-540-7596
fx.: 510-848-3913
mo.: 510-435-8234
------------------------------------

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

August 2019
June 2019
May 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager