> Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 14:30:32 +0100
> From: "Edward C. Zimmermann" <[log in to unmask]>
>> I think you've missed an earlier part of the discussion. CQL
>> already has nice, general syntax for the general proximity
>> searching. What we're talking about here is whether a specific
>> case of proxmity ("same element" searching) is best expressed using
>> proximity with a specific
> I don't sematically see "same element" (in the same leaf container)
> as proximity.
Hmm. I am trying to think of a polite way to say "then you are
mistaken", but I can't find one. :-)
> Proximity is distance.. Within X characters.. Within X
> words.. within some metric. Same element is NOT a metric.
If you really want to push this point, you'll have to overturn an
ANSI/NISO standard going back a full decade and ratified by ISO. See
/o ) \/ Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]> http://www.miketaylor.org.uk
)_v__/\ "When the seagulls follow the trawler, it is because they think
sardines will be thrown overboard" -- Eric Cantona. Yeah, right.