On 12/22/05, Houghton,Andrew <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> So basically it reinvents MARC-XML in RDF.
Yup. Guess someone had to do it.
> 1) it needs to use rdf:parseType instead of parseType; the RDF validator throws warnings about depricated usage.
> 2) it's unclear why it uses md:value; can someone give a reason why rdf:value would not be appropriate in this context.
> 3) it's unclear why there are two additional levels, e.g., md:data and md:RecordData; can someone give a reason why they exist.
Dunno (except I'm sure 1 was just an oversight); post a note on his blog?