> Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 12:19:09 +0000
> From: Ashley Sanders <[log in to unmask]>
>> After a fair bit of discussion, the SRU Editorial Board has come up
>> with a proposal for adding sorting capabilities to CQL, the query
>> language of SRU. The proposal (with motivation and examples) is at
>> We welcome comments.
> Can I suggest some consistency with the naming of index
> modifiers. Some are mixtures of lower case and abbreviations, eg
> icase; some are spelt out in full in mixed case, eg missingOmit.
You have a point. Of course, the problem here as always is the
conflicting drives towards conciseness and explicitness, but I agree
that we should let the same drive win in all the names :-)
> I'd suggest using mixed case spelt out in full for
> all the modifiers, ie:
I'd not be opposed to that resolution.
/o ) \/ Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]> http://www.miketaylor.org.uk
)_v__/\ "I saw one of the Democrat delegates, a middle-aged man, driving
a bumper car while talking on his cellphone. It's time for the
Revolution" -- Dave Barry.