LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  February 2006

ARSCLIST February 2006

Subject:

Re: De-static question

From:

Rod Stephens <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sun, 12 Feb 2006 23:52:34 -0800

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (71 lines)

This may have already been mentioned, since I've not read all the many 
responses on this tracking subject (I should rename this "Tracking 
tricks was De-static question", but I've been chastised in the past for 
using the wrong syntax, so I'll stick with the above). 

My turntable is not the most expensive nor the cheapest, but I've had 
good success by elevating the left side of the table when I have 
skipping from warped disks.  Of course, I have to experiment to find the 
best angle or degree, but generally I find raising the table two or 
three inches by putting a stack of CD cases under the two left feet 
seems to do the job.  I think most of the modern tables arms are so well 
balanced that they will track in this position, even without the 
warping, but the angle helps gravity exert enough sideways force to help 
get past the up and down gyrations.  I've saved quite a few disk to 
computer transfers this way.

Rod Stephens
Family Theater Productions

Tom Fine wrote:

> I've had it work for vinyl, but I've only done it when it was 
> untrackable at 3 grams. So only a few times. And even after it's 
> fixed, it's still hill-and-dale hell, so usually not even worth 
> listening or transferring. But since so much interesting stuff is out 
> of print or never made it to CD, a fella needs an arsenal of tricks.
>
> -- Tom Fine
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "steven c" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2006 5:48 PM
> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] De-static question
>
>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom Fine" 
>> <[log in to unmask]>
>>
>>> I think the only time you'd do this -- EVER -- would be if you 
>>> cannot dial
>>
>> your tonearm heavy enough
>>
>>> to track a very badly warped record. And I think you'd be better off
>>
>> investing in a couple of plates
>>
>>> of 13"x13" glass and putting the record in an oven on the WARM 
>>> setting and
>>
>> no higher for an hour or
>>
>>> two and then turning the oven off and letting it cool to room temp. The
>>
>> top plate of glass should be
>>
>>> heavier than the bottom plate, so gravity can be your ally. I'd much
>>
>> rather take measures on the
>>
>>> vinyl than on the cartridge and tonearm.
>>>
>> While that method works just fine for shellac discs (78's), I tend to
>> wonder how well it would work on vinyl records. With vinyl, the warpage
>> as actually caused by expansion, and not by the substance becoming more
>> flexible as its temperature rises...
>>
>> Steven C. Barr 
>
>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager