LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  March 2006

ARSCLIST March 2006

Subject:

DiscWelder Bronze first blush

From:

Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 28 Mar 2006 08:07:52 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (52 lines)

Someone asked over the weekend about DVD's and audio. I mentioned I bought a copy of DiscWelder 
Bronze to make DVD-Audio discs and now that I've made a few, some observations:

1. the interface is very simple and the manual is only 25 pages (gotta print a PDF). Simple is good 
in this case. If you want all the bells and whistles, it costs hundreds more for the more deluxe 
editions.

2. Minnetonka Software is small enough that they're easy to deal with. I had what turned out to be a 
somewhat silly question but they were patient and I got right through to a human by calling the main 
number.

3. I have a Plextor 12x DVD+/-RW drive, external hooked by firewire. I noticed one of the big 
downfalls of using DVD media -- even recent drives are somewhat picky about what discs they'll 
reliably burn. Plextor burns a wide range but it would not take generic 8x CD-R with an inkjet-print 
coating on top, I suspect because the discs were obviously thicker than silver-top and may not fit 
the drive properly, but it also might be that Plextor's laser doesn't like that shade of purple dye. 
In any case, I generally don't have this problem with CDRW drives, except my Plextor Pro won't burn 
the dirt-cheapo Staples and OfficeMax CDR's (probably as a measure to save the user from himself 
;) ). Anyway, as I tell my clients, DVD media is great as a TRANSIT medium, to get a lot of files 
from my hard drives to their hard drives, but I would not consider it an ARCHIVAL medium until 
there's more data about how permanent the discs are. For my purposes here, it's a playback medium 
and if the disc wears out I'll just burn another.

4. One of the hidden joys of DVD-A is that you can fit a LOT of mono 44.1/16 content on it. Just 
assign the file to the center channel only and then no need for twice the space used for left and 
right channels. So if a normal CDR can hold approximately 160 minutes of mono 44.1/16 WAV, a DVD-A 
disc can hold more than 5x that, and play it back in real-deal mono (ie through one speaker) if you 
have a 5-channel system. So for all the OTR fans out there, there is no longer an excuse to pack a 
CDR with hours and hours of junk-sounding low-bitrate MP3 -- just pack a DVD-A with full-monty CD 
quality audio. This format is also useful for, for instance an opera recorded off the radio. 5+ 
hours of 2-channel CD-quality audio fit on these things.

5. the DiscWelder manual warns about long burn times but the recent-vintage Philips drive in my 
office Dell computer didn't take what I consider outrageous time (about 30 minutes to compile, burn 
and verify a disc that used 89% of the DVD's space). Video DVD's take longer to render and burn 
using Sony Vegas in this computer.

6. Even using 2-channel 96/24 quality, a DVD holds two full symphonies with room to spare.

7. Most DVD players will play back DVD-A but check that yours does before taking this road. Some of 
the newer dirt-cheap models do not. And some of the older (2 years old or more) models won't read 
dye-burned media. Don't be confused: this is NOT SACD, it's DVD-A, which allows for up to 192/24 PCM 
digital. SACD is a whole different thing and you need an SACD-compatible player as well as (costly) 
SACD converters and authoring software to go that road.

8. I see a little bit of chatter about DVD-A on the audiophile boards but I'm surprised it hasn't 
caught on more widely. I see it as the most cost-effective way to get a convenient playback (ie not 
chained to a DAW) of high-resolution digital. It's arguable that SACD sounds better, but I sure 
don't see any hobbyist-priced SACD recording and disc-creation system out there yet.

-- Tom Fine

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager