My routine is the following: Approved items are announced to the JAC list, the IETF-languages list, the ISO639 list, the ISO639-2 list, as well as the proposer. Rejected items are announced to the JAC list and to the proposer.
From: ISO 639 Joint Advisory Committee [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Rebecca S. Guenther
Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 5:32 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Probably resolved ISO 639 item - Norfolk
Havard: That makes sense to me. I assume you will respond to the requester?
On Fri, 24 Mar 2006, [iso-8859-1] Håvard Hjulstad wrote:
> Dear JAC members,
> Following the submission of the enclosed message there were a few comments to the effect that the requested item is encoded in ISO 639-3 as "pih" = Pitcairn-Norfolk.
> Unless someone comments to the contrary effect within 14 April 2006, I will "park" the item and consider the proposal rejected as far as the encoding of a new item is concerned. I will also not propose to include "pih" in 639-2 unless a JAC member specifically asks for it.
> Best regards,
> Håvard Hjulstad
> Standard Norge / Standards Norway
> direkte tel / direct tel: (+47) 67838645
> mailto:[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> http://www.standard.no/ <http://www.standard.no/>