LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


[email protected]


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  April 2006

ARSCLIST April 2006

Subject:

Re: Vinyl use and access policies

From:

Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 25 Apr 2006 06:10:01 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (85 lines)

Hi David:

I can't see how your argument makes sense. Every time ANYONE -- trained or not -- plays an LP, it
degrades the surface. Sure, an optimum turntable will degrade it less (and a laser turntable
theoretically won't degrade it at all), but real-world experience says most people are too rough on
rare records even if they read an "LP 101" sheet. As I said in a previous post, if I had a public
collection, I would NEVER circulate something no longer in print. Depending on what percentage of
your collection that entails, it could mean a large transfer job. The way things are going, all of
us with vinyl (and CD's) are going to have to face this because Big Music continues to take what
they consider "non-mainstream" material out of print at an alarming rate. Plus, there was still an
awful lot of non-rock/non-pop material that never made it to CD and is unlikely to given the
continuing trends.

Your library did so well with your Edison cylinders. Why not assess your other grooved disks and
start an aggressive transfer program for all that can't be replaced if a newbie scratched it or even
an experienced hand dropped the stylus or the LP slipped out of the sleeve while one of your
employees was putting it back on the shelf?

There was a TDK tape commercial that used to air on the old "King Biscuit Flower Hour" rock-concert
radio show. The protagonist said "all my friends think I'm crazy" because he'd get a new LP and
immediately record it to a TDK-SA cassette and then listen to the cassette. The idea, of course, was
to claim the cassette sounded as good as the original (um, not in my experience), but the concept
sure seems ahead of its time nowadays. When I get new-old or minty-old vinyl now, I VPI clean it and
then play it once into a high-rez digital transfer. The digi-file is what gets played from then on.
Sure, I love to look at the sleeve and appreciate the larger-font liner notes vs most CD's -- and if
CD remasters sounded better I'd have the CD in the first place, assuming it's in print. But I
consider that vinyl non-replaceable and treat it as such.

Side note: a lot of CD's you bought in the earlier era (late 80's, early 90's) are now out of print,
too. Some have been replaced with different or even better remasters, but many are simply out of
print. In the jazz world, for instance, a lot of old Verve and Mercury albums that were on CD's
originated from Japan are now available only as (YUK) itunes downloads! There is a similar situation
in the classical world, too. Alas, I think every version of "Cindy Lauper's Greatest Hits" is still
in print.

-- Tom Fine

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Seubert" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 11:12 PM
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Vinyl use and access policies


And to expand on what Bill said, if you don't have staff to play LPs for
people, it's important to ask patrons if they are comfortable playing
LPs and not assume they know how to use a turntable. We provide
assistance to patrons who need a refresher (or have never seen an LP!)
and we have printed cards with "LP 101" tips on proper handling and
playback that we borrowed from our music library. A five minute intro on
how to play an LP is a lot faster than making a CD copy and gets you
pretty much the same results as far as preserving the collection goes.

David Seubert

Bill Schurk wrote:

>Yo:
> I'm responding by echoing what David S. has written. We at the Sound Recordings Archives at
> Bowling Green State University have NEVER circulated nor have we ever allowed the handling of any
> recordings for the public listening booths by anyone except our own trained staff. We now have
> eight turntables. When we opened in 1967 we had two plus a transcription table that we still have
> and use today! We could never find staff time to make digital copies nor can we find space to
> even house them if we had them. We are nearing 110,000 separate cataloging records in OCLC,
> downloading to our own BGlink. Way over 100,000 pieces are vinyl with the rest are CD's, DVD's,
> and VHS tapes. And, yes, I remember those first cataloged slabs o' vinyl I entered into the
> collection in late 1967 and early 1968. They are still being played and are still in verrrrrry
> good condition. We get so many gifts of LP's from that era that we also upgrade wherever
> possible. We still have most of our
> original Beatles, Stones, Doors, Hendrix, Moody Blues, Pearls Before Swine, and Wayne Fontana and
> the Mindbenders pieces. We have to watch out that we never replace those original pressings
> though for newer repros that are of less intrinsic value and many time have special packaging or
> label of container info that newer issues don't have.
> And then what about the still to be cataloged 200,000+ LP's we (i.e. I) have to catalog?? And
> the 300,000+ 45's?
> Bill Schurk
> Sound Recordings Archivist
> Music Library and Sound Recordings Archives
> William T. Jerome Library
> Bowling Green State University
> Bowling Green, OH 43403-0179
> [log in to unmask]
> Bowling Green, O
>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager