LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


[email protected]


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  April 2006

ARSCLIST April 2006

Subject:

Re: portable sound recording devices

From:

David Lewiston <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 18 Apr 2006 19:26:21 -1000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (109 lines)

Omni or directional mics for outdoor recording?

No contest. An omni mic designed for outdoor use will be much less prone to
wind noice than a cardioid. Hence my selection of the RE50. Additionally,
the business part of the mic is enclosed in a handholdable casing.

While a cardioid may function adequately on a windless day, the right omni
will take wind gusts of 10-15 mph in its stride.

David Lewiston



----- Original Message -----
From: "David Lewiston" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: April 18, 2006 6:01 PM
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] portable sound recording devices


> Thanks, Steve
>
> I didn't realise the vulnerability of condenser mics until I had a
> terrible time in Jammu. Nearly all the recordings (male "singers" who
> shouted at the tops of their lungs) yielded vilely distorted recordings.
>
> My good friend Nishi Nakra in Delhi -- to my way of thinking, the best
> loudspeaker designer in India, thought it was the "capsules bottoming."
> But when I discussed the problem with Klaus Heyne, the microphone maestro,
> he opined that it was the FETs that caused the problem. So I paid his not
> inconsiderable fee to have the mics (KM84s) Klaused.
>
> I use three basic setups in the field: Mid-Side, with a KM84 and a
> Sennheiser MKH30 configured in a Rycote windscreen, for street recording,
> and also small combos indoors; a pair of crossed KM84s to record Tibetan
> rituals, with the mics set up at the shrine end of the temple; and a
> spaced pair of RE50s--I've made amazing good recordings with the latter,
> in fact, they're the only mics I use in Bali, where I also insist on
> recording outdoors. The current crop of DAWs (I use Samplitude) make it a
> snap to turn Mid-Side originals into regular stereo.
>
> Salutations, David L
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Steven Smolian" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: April 18, 2006 4:44 PM
> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] portable sound recording devices
>
>
>> If this is the David Lewiston who made the Explorer Series for Nonesuch,
>> etc., he has more experience than all of us combined in recording folk
>> instruments and groups under all kinds of circumstances. I've admired
>> his skillful work from the git-go.
>>
>> Steve Smolian
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Richard L. Hess" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 10:07 PM
>> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] portable sound recording devices
>>
>>
>>> At 09:34 PM 4/18/2006, David Lewiston wrote:
>>>>When recording such a loud instrument, the mic should not be too close
>>>>to it. For pipes & shawms I prefer not to place the mics closer than 20
>>>>feet. Because such loud instruments are intended to be heard out of
>>>>doors, that's where I record them.
>>>>
>>>>If a condenser mic mic is too close to such a loud instrument, it may
>>>>well overload diaphragm and/or the FET. I've run into this sort of
>>>>problem.
>>>>
>>>>For such an application I would leave the Neumann condensers in the
>>>>carrying bag, choosing instead a dynamic omni such as the EV RE 50,
>>>>which is very well behaved.
>>>
>>> I don't disagree with the advice but the mic preamp may be what is
>>> overloaded, not the mic itself.
>>>
>>> Do bagpipes really get up to 120 dB SPL where you would mic them? The
>>> Audio Technica AT-822 that I suggested as a good buy will generate 1%
>>> THD at 1 kHz at 125 dB SPL.
>>>
>>> At that point, the mic will be putting out over half a volt AC.
>>>
>>> If indeed the bagpipe is putting out in excess of 120 dB SPL, then the
>>> musician needs to seriously worry about hearing protection.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Richard
>>>
>>>
>>> Tape Restoration Seminar: MAY 9-12, 2006; details at Web site.
>>> Richard L. Hess email: [log in to unmask]
>>> Aurora, Ontario, Canada (905) 713 6733 1-877-TAPE-FIX
>>> Detailed contact information:
>>> http://www.richardhess.com/tape/contact.htm
>>>
>>> --
>>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>> Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.4.3/316 - Release Date: 4/17/2006
>>>
>>>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager