LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  April 2006

ARSCLIST April 2006

Subject:

Re: Poor sounding concert halls.

From:

steven c <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 10 Apr 2006 22:55:22 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (124 lines)

In fact, is acoustics an exact enough science that we know why one hall
sounds better than another?
Steven C. Barr

----- Original Message -----
From: "Steven Smolian" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, April 07, 2006 9:52 PM
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Poor sounding concert halls.


> Even as a non-profit, an orchestra has a financial responsibilty toward
> those supporting it if it wishes to survive. It can't be built along side
a
> bottomless pit or it will fall into it during bad economic times when its
> supporters may be under pressure.
>
> The CSO owns the hall. On days when it is not performing, the hall is
> rented as a concert theater. That is a non-monopolistic booking situation
> in which it competes for attractions. Othe venues with air conditioning
> have a distinct advantage. Air conditioning is necessary.
>
> The true issue is how the need for a/c was met. I think it is safe to say
> that more concert hall alterations are unsuccessful than neutral, much
less
> an improvement. This is particularly so for older buildings. A big cause
> of these failures is that rebuilding cancels some grandfathered in code
> violations. Different materials, with different acoustical properties-
> densisties, etc., replace older, more confligration-dangerous ones. Air
> conditioning removes cubic volume from resonant spaces. etc.
>
> The art is applying science to accomodate these changes. Even with the
> latest computer technology to assist the architect, most new and rebulit
> halls flunk.
>
> In addition, the audience's expectations are partially derived from
> listening to records on various levels of equipment, made by engineers who
> have to accomodate a conductor who often wants the record to sound more as
> he hears it from the podium rather from the audience's perspective. What
> recording does the architect use as a model?
>
> Complex is an understatement
>
> Steve Smolian
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Don Tait" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Friday, April 07, 2006 7:27 PM
> Subject: [ARSCLIST] Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Fwd: [ARSCLIST] The waltz (was Which
> U.S. orchestra recorded ...
>
>
> > Brenda is correct. It's true that air conditioning was added to
Orchestra
> > Hall during the 1966 renovation, but the project was undertaken for far
> > bigger
> > reasons. The majority were calamities, above all the idea that the sound
> > of
> > the hall could be improved, whereas it was wrecked. But another was the
> > practical one of giving the CSO members a reasonably comfortable
backstage
> > space for
> > themselves, which they'd never had. I remember standing on Michigan
Avenue
> > during the summer of 1966 and looking through the glass on Orchestra
> > Hall's doors.
> > I could see traffic on Wabash Avenue, a block behind the building.
> > Everything
> > in Orchestra Hall, including its stage and back wall, was gone. All was
> > rebuilt and reconfigured during the renovation.
> >
> > Don Tait
> >
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
------
>
>
> "A sad tale of greed" ?????? With all due respect, let's get real here.
> We're talking about a venue that seats over 2500 people and has over 100
> musicians on stage in suits under hot lights. Any modernization efforts
> would obviously include the installation of air conditioning.
>
> Brenda
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Marcos Sueiro
> Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 9:30 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Fwd: [ARSCLIST] The waltz (was Which U.S. orchestra
> recorded first and Arthur...
>
> Chicago's Orchestra Hall when empty. The latter changed with the
> > disastrous renovation of 1966, which essentially wrecked Orchestra
> Hall
> > as a listening or recording venue.)
>
> I find it particularly poignant that they did it to add A/C so that they
>
> could extend their season. A sad tale of greed.
>
> Marcos
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
------
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.3.5/303 - Release Date: 4/6/2006
>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Error during command authentication.

Error - unable to initiate communication with LISTSERV (errno=111). The server is probably not started.

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager