LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


[email protected]


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  April 2006

ARSCLIST April 2006

Subject:

Re: Fwd: [ARSCLIST] The waltz (was Which U.S. orchestra recorded first and Arthur...

From:

Roger and Allison Kulp <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 5 Apr 2006 07:58:47 -0700

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (42 lines)

I had read this before.What I had never learned,was who  produced/engineered the RCA classical recordings in the pre-Lp era ?  Ifigured if anybody would know,you guy would.Roger

Don Tait <[log in to unmask]> wrote:    Regarding Karl's message, all pre-war (WWII) Boston Symphony (and Pops) 
recordings were indeed made in Symphony Hall. The only exception was Harris's 
Symphony 1933, recorded live by Columbia in Carnegie Hall in early 1934. 

  I don't have complete information and other may know more. However, the 
reason for the lack of reverberation on the pre-1940 or so Boston recordings 
seems to be that the rehearsal curtain in Symphony Hall was drawn for the 
sessions. It was routinely used to cut down the immense reverberation in the hall when 
it was empty. Beginning with the Koussevitzky sessions in November 1944, 
Victor seems to have worked without that deadening influence. (When there was an 
audience, Symphony Hall was and is ideal. Either Richard Mohr or John Pfeiffer 
of RCA Victor were quoted somewhere as saying during the 1950s nor '60s that 
the two finest halls for recording in the USA were Symphony Hall when full or 
Chicago's Orchestra Hall when empty. The latter changed with the disastrous 
renovation of 1966, which essentially wrecked Orchestra Hall as a listening or 
recording venue.)

  Don Tait
On Mon, 3 Apr 2006, Goran Finnberg wrote:

> Which makes the practice of adding echo after the recording highly
> dubious for classical music as you´re correct that the tempo is set by
> how long the ambience is in the room where the recording was done.

I agree. It really does become something else. But then I wonder...were
the preLP Boston Symphony Orchestra recordings made in Symphony
Hall...with its acoustic, yet recorded with such a dry sound. The NBC
Symphony in 8 H was one thing, but I do wonder...

I am reminded of some of the Dutton Boston Symphony Transfers with the
added reverb...it all sounds so unnatural, or is it that I am used to
listening to it with a dry acoustic.

Karl


		
---------------------------------
New Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Call regular phones from your PC and save big.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Error during command authentication.

Error - unable to initiate communication with LISTSERV (errno=111). The server is probably not started.

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager