steven c wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mike Richter" <[log in to unmask]>
>>At some point, UCSB will realize that their posting of cylinders relies
>>on rational interpretation of law. Given the recent finding by the New
>>York Supreme Court, the 1923 'rule' does not apply.
> Actually, there never WAS a "1923 'rule'" for sound recordings.
Of course you're right. That's why I used single quotes for the 'rule'.
However, my inference from seeing what is and what is not offered in
clips is that someone believed there was such a limitation. It is now
unequivocal that there is none.
[log in to unmask]