To be fair I do not know the whole story, and perhaps I am being unfair.
The story, as I was told, was that the reason for the renovation was to
extend the season through the summer in Chicago, in order to generate more
income. *If* that was the main reason, I would find it sad that the result
was what most consider poorer acoustics for the whole season.
But again, I do not know the whole story.
--On Tuesday, April 04, 2006 9:42 AM -0400 "Nelson-Strauss, Brenda"
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> "A sad tale of greed" ?????? With all due respect, let's get real here.
> We're talking about a venue that seats over 2500 people and has over 100
> musicians on stage in suits under hot lights. Any modernization efforts
> would obviously include the installation of air conditioning.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Marcos Sueiro
> Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 9:30 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Fwd: [ARSCLIST] The waltz (was Which U.S. orchestra
> recorded first and Arthur...
> Chicago's Orchestra Hall when empty. The latter changed with the
>> disastrous renovation of 1966, which essentially wrecked Orchestra
>> as a listening or recording venue.)
> I find it particularly poignant that they did it to add A/C so that they
> could extend their season. A sad tale of greed.