LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ISOJAC Archives


ISOJAC Archives

ISOJAC Archives


ISOJAC@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ISOJAC Home

ISOJAC Home

ISOJAC  April 2006

ISOJAC April 2006

Subject:

Re: 2-letter and 3-letter codes

From:

Christian Galinski <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Mon, 24 Apr 2006 09:42:49 +0200

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (124 lines)

Dear Gérard,

There is an ISO/TC 37 standard on alphabetisation, which reflect the
user's point of view in oredering character strings:

ISO 12199:2000 Alphabetical ordering of multilingual terminological and
lexicographical data represented in the Latin alphabet

I may add that there may be other "common ways" of alphabitic ordering,
such as for telephone directories etc., which do not follow a
"standardized" way.

Best regards
Christian



---------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Christian Galinski, Director
Infoterm - International Information Centre for Terminology
Mariahilfer Strasse 123/3, A-1060 Vienna, Austria
T: +43-664-344 6181
[log in to unmask]  -  http://www.infoterm.info
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Founded in 1971 by UNESCO to promote and organize 
co-operation in the field of terminology worldwide
__________________________________________________
THIS E-MAIL HAS BEEN SCANNED FOR ALL KNOWN VIRUSES



-----Original Message-----
From: Lang Gerard [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
Sent: 21. april 2006 08:46
To: Havard Hjulstad (E-mail)
Cc: Lang Gerard
Subject: TR: 2-letter and 3-letter codes



 
 
 Dear Havard,

I send you a copy of my exchange with Michael Everson.

All the best.

Gerard LANG

-----Message d'origine-----
De : Lang Gerard 
Envoye : vendredi 21 avril 2006 08:37
A : 'Michael Everson'; Lang Gerard
Cc : ISO 639 RA-JAC
Objet : RE: 2-letter and 3-letter codes


Dear Michael,

Thank you for your message.

 I respect your opinion, but it remains only an opinion  (even if, as
pratically everybody, I am pretty sure that only my personnal opinions
are the bests in the world). 
 My point about ISO 639 is that the normative clauses, the ISO
639/RA-JAC is entitled to manage with, are in contradiction with your
opinion, and that the ISO 639/RA-JAC does not  have the right to "have a
policy" permitting to do something against what is written in clause 4.2
of ISO 639-1, that has been adopted in 2002. So I am obliged to remark
that your opinion (that should not be recent, and so was the same before
2002) has not at all been taken in charge by ISO 639 (otherwise the
point that you support and that is important would have been explicitely
included in the text), and is not normative. So we both are not members
of ISO  639/RA-JAC, but both have opposite opinions about what they
should do concerning my propositions. But my point is that, concerning
this question, the first (and perhaps only) thing they have to do is to
follow what is written in the ISO 639 standard they voted and accepted,
as it is mandatory in the ISO world.

Tres cordialement.

Gerard LANG

N.B.:This exchange gives me the occasion of a question concerning ISO
15924 "Code pour la representation des noms d'ecritures". Do you
consider that the four-letter  scripts codes given by ISO 15924 to
represent "scripts", defined as "set of graphic characters used for the
written form of one or more languages", are representing ordered set of
graphic characters or do not consider any privilegied order concerning
the graphic characters included in the considered set ?
:
..

 
-----Message d'origine-----
De : Michael Everson [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Envoye : jeudi 20 avril 2006 21:35
A : [log in to unmask]
Cc : ISO 639 RA-JAC
Objet : 2-letter and 3-letter codes


Dear Mr Lang,

I am one of the people who, years ago, insisted on an ISO 639 policy 
regarding 2- and 3-letter codes for languages.

The reason the rule exists is to insure stability and uniqueness in 
the use of these tags on for instance the internet. Tok Pisin, Tetum, 
and Palauan have the ADVANTAGE of having only one code to worry about 
right now. The official language of my country, Ireland, have to 
contend with two possible taggings, ga/gle and en/eng respectively.

I am not a voting member of the ISO 639 JAC, but I support their 
decision. "tpi", "tet", and "pau" are unique identifiers for these 
languages, and they are not disadvantaged in any way for not also 
having 2-letter codes.

In my personal opinion, there is no reason that ANY more 2-letter 
codes should be added.
-- 
Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

April 2021
January 2021
November 2020
June 2020
May 2019
February 2019
September 2018
April 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
May 2016
April 2016
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
May 2013
April 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager