LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for FEDLIB Archives


FEDLIB Archives

FEDLIB Archives


FEDLIB@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

FEDLIB Home

FEDLIB Home

FEDLIB  May 2006

FEDLIB May 2006

Subject:

Print vs. Digital Cont.

From:

OCLC FEDLINK <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

FEDLIB: Federal Librarians Discussion List

Date:

Wed, 17 May 2006 09:47:15 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (144 lines)

List Monitors Note:
For the sake of not forwarding every email dealing with this topic, I have copied the body of the text below from numerous posting received over the past days.  The are posted in order of being received with the most recent at the top...

________________________________
05/15/06 10:02 AM
For the last 8-10 years, the NIH Library has systemmatically tried to
convert all its print journals to online, preferrably online only.  We
also are acquiring online backfiles where available if budget permits.
Presently, 90% of the 5000 plus journals to which we subscribe are
available to our users online.  Users strongly indicate a preference for
online access.  However, our users also tell us that they want us to
keep older print backfiles because the quaility of scanned color plates
and grey-scale images are not the same as viewing the original print.
Use of the print collection for this or any other purpose is very low,
but we are trying to oblige as space permits.  When color plates and
grey-scale images are not an issue, we do discard print backfiles when
we have gotten them electronically.  The quality of the current online
images are superior to print in many cases, so retaining current print
issues is not as necessary.  
 
We have been much slower at acquiring online books.  Our strategy has  been to acquire major textbooks or reference books online for quick look up use.  Most of our users still prefer print when reading monographs.
 
As to a study, we have conducted user surveys every other year to find their needs and preferences and we also monitor usage of print material very closely.  When we began the conversion to online in the mid-90's we did so by concentrating on the 50 most heavily used print titles and then on the 350 most heavily used.  By the time we had these, publishers were offering packages which we feel provided us with opportunities to expand our online collections at a reasonable cost.  Our goal is 100% online access, but at present we have about 450 journal subscriptions that are only available in print.
 
I hope this is the kind of information you are seeking.
 
Suzanne Grefsheim 
Director, Division of Library Services 
Office of Research Services 
National Institutes of Health 
10 Center Drive, MSC-1150 
Bethesda, MD 20892 
301.496.2448 (voice) 
301.402.0254 (fax) 
http://nihlibrary.nih.gov <http://nihlibrary.nih.gov/>  


_________________________________________
05/15/06 9:49 AM
Daniel,
 
We have been moving the entire Naval Research Laboratory library to a digital platform over the past 18 years.  We've had a set of strategic
efforts with management backing to convert large portions of the library to digital over the years including digitizing over 200,000 unclassified reports (10M pages) to TIFF starting back in 1988 - that data has since gone through two major evolutions and is still accessible online (now stored in PDF format).  We've also successfully moved from 1,400 print journal titles 10+ years ago to over 3,000 online journals now with less than 2 dozen print titles - at the same time we have online access to over 60% of our entire print journal archive (an extensive collection of over 60,000 bound volumes from nearly 1,500 journals).
 
Since our primary sources of information are journals, conference
proceedings, and reports, we can more easily make a quest towards an 'all digital' future than a traditional public-type library with a primary
collection of books can.  Since we were early adopters and have continued to push the envelope with digital technology with an eye towards providing better service to our researchers, we're viewed as an excellent resource by management and scientists and were specifically excluded from an A-76 study by top management several years ago.  
 
As others have said, it not not cheaper to go digital but does have some long term advantages, including being able to 'do more with less' and being able to provide the service that more and more users want - a Google-like access to the library's resources.  Beware of the urban legends and positioning by traditional librarians in debates like this, many are threatened by change and throw up barriers to making a real difference in this space.  In the end, overhead is a thing to be cut whereas a mission critical service directly helps the bottom line - without a strong digital presence, libraries are viewed as simply overhead.
 
Feel free to contact me if you have more questions.

-James

R. James King, MLS
Chief Librarian
Naval Research Laboratory
Ruth H. Hooker Research Library
"NRL Partner in Research" for over 75 years!

[log in to unmask] 
(202) 767-2357
___________________________________
05/12/06 2:54 PM
Because of the extremely high number of staff NOT in the DC area, we
rewrote our collection development policy a few years ago to clearly
state a preference for electronic over print.  I'll give you a quick
sketch of what that has meant.

Because we have access to several aggregators (Infotrac, Proquest
Research, and a few others), we checked current subscriptions against
titles held by the aggregators.  We cancelled many of the print
subscriptions, but not all.

For many annual reference works we switched from print to electronic.
But not for all.  As with our periodicals, there were some titles that
reference staff insisted we have on hand in print. Those opinions were
based on workflow issues, walk-in traffic, etc.

For monographs, although we built a good collection of e-books (just
over 2,000 titles),  monographs rarely offer the option of electronic
over print.  When important, in-scope, new titles are published they are almost never simultaneously available electronically.

Our virtual library has been a great success.  Usage is high.
Department of State staff posted overseas love having access to
searchable daily US newspapers, news magazines, and all the basic
reference works.  But if any library committed itself to 100% electronic
right now, they'd be mighty foolish.  The products aren't there (books
especially).  For some products the cost is way too high. And our
customers are generally not eager to read books in full from a screen...
And they may never be interested in that.

Ned Kraft
Acquisitions Librarian
US Department of State
_____________________________
5/12/06 2:32 PM
Regarding digital conversion, with or without, a study:  This is an
addendum to my earlier reply.  We did do something quick, cheap, and
very useful.  We had an old card catalog with hundreds of drawers of
cards analyzing report literature from five libraries dating back to the
1940s; no chance of having that redone in MARC or COSATI format.  Using Adobe Acrobat Professional, we scanned and digitized the Shelf List and put the results on a shared server. Now we can search the catalog from our desktops, which makes it most useful as the collection is about five miles away.  It went quickly and easily and we were able to discard the old card catalog.
LeTendre, Louise (Civ, ARL/CISD)" <[log in to unmask]>
_____________________________
05/12/06 2:42 PM
I agree, I think Mr. Hadden's comments are excellent as well.  Many
library users,IT departments, and some librarians are very taken with
the "virtual everything" idea. 

What happens when you can no longer subscribe to a database that had full text resources?  And, as far as I can see, there never have been any answers to what happens when the company producing the full text database goes out of busisness.  How are you supposed to get the materials if you never subscribed to the print copy?  Yes, there is ILL but what if the item you wanted was not purchased by anyone you can borrow from?  And what about things that are available only in
electronic format?  

Anne Maria Frketich, MLS		
Reference Librarian
Armed Forces Medical Library 
5109 Leesburg Pike, Room 670
Falls Church, VA  22041
E-mail:  [log in to unmask] 
Phone: 703-681-1104;  FAX: 703-681-8034
www.tricare.osd.mil/afml 
___________________________________
05/12/06 1:48 PM
I created a virtual library with webpac and PDFs for the NY State Department of Labor in 1999-2000.  
NY State funds the development of workplace safety traing.  And at the time had accumulated some 80 documents boxes of materials.
After sorting and shelving the materials we began cataloging and scanning.  We digitized about 80,000 pages.  this was done with a contractor and in house staff over a period of about 10 months.
A contractor was used as a jump start to scan a good portion of the documents so that the webpac would be a credible public resource.
The balance of the materials were scanned in the resource center using an HP9100 digital sender, scannner.
After completing work on the NYS materials we began searching for other related open source documents and added weblinks and other PDFs to our webpac.
NYSafety.org's funding was discontinued in 2002 and the website shutdown.

Ronald Joe, librarian 
(860) 694 5157; DSN 694 5157 
[log in to unmask] 
Fax - 860 694 4809 
www.NSMRL.navy.mil 

Naval Submarine Medical Research Laboratory 
Naval Submarine Base New London Box 900 
Bldg 148, Trout Avenue 
Groton, CT 06349-5900 

 
 

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager