LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for EDUCAT Archives


EDUCAT Archives

EDUCAT Archives


EDUCAT@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

EDUCAT Home

EDUCAT Home

EDUCAT  June 2006

EDUCAT June 2006

Subject:

Re: On My Mind (AL, June/July issue)

From:

"Diane I. Hillmann" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Discussion List for issues related to cataloging & metadata education & training <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 15 Jun 2006 09:56:51 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (105 lines)

Cheryl:

I think if we expect professionally trained librarians to oversee or 
integrate "industrial" cataloging into what has been primarily a 
"craft" model, we need to teach them how to evaluate cataloging based 
on what it should be doing in theory. By evaluation, I mean the usual 
"one-at-a-time" kind of evaluation, as well as in a batch mode.  In a 
sense, this approaches the problem of cataloging both as a "craft" 
(which it has been traditionally) and as a "product" (which it is 
becoming).

I'm not certain how this might fit into a standard cataloging course 
(which I only taught a few times, in the dim mists of the past), but 
I've used simple forms of these evaluation techniques in a two-day 
course I'm doing for ALCTS (Metadata Standards and Applications). 
Clearly, if we look at what cataloging managers do, evaluation of 
cataloging as a product is an increasingly important aspect of their 
jobs and builds on (but is significantly different than) traditional 
cataloging training they might have received in school or on the job.

In some respects, this is part of a broader view of traditional 
cataloging information as a particular flavor of structured data: 
which must be managed, maintained, and transformed as needs change. 
It may well be that taking this view (as opposed to a primarily 
"craft" view) might break down whatever resistance remains on the 
part of some students to take cataloging classes.

I do realize that this view breaks down barriers sacred in some 
library schools between traditional librarianship and the other 
information management specialities not oriented towards library 
practice.  I think that's intentional on my part, because I believe 
that there should definitely be fewer barriers. Those students aimed 
toward libraries should have a much better grounding in data 
management and presentation, and those looking towards careers 
outside traditional libraries should have a much better sense of what 
has been learned in over a century of information organization in 
libraries.

Diane

>Diane--
>    I tell my students that cataloging is like shop class where they 
>are making a beautiful paper towel holder for their moms as a way to 
>learn how to safely use cataloging tools (without accidentally 
>sticking a MARC indicator in an eye), but that real life cataloging 
>today is more like an industrial process than the craft of previous 
>times.
>
>Beyond the things one learns by actually wielding the tools, do you 
>think that the industrial aspects of cataloging should have a more 
>prominent place in the standard cataloging course? They are 
>certainly less amenable to workshop learning and more in the 
>managerial/theoretical mode that has been proposed as the proper 
>level for master's courses.
>
>Does anyone think that someone like Arthus Marx would have come out 
>of the one cataloging course less overwhelmed if there were more 
>emphasis on catalog management or database-level decision-making? Or 
>is that the province of an IR or DL or web design course and 
>cataloging shouldn't touch it?
>
>(Note that I am asking this question fully aware of Arlene Taylor's 
>comments about the overstuffed cataloging course. I have no idea 
>what could be jettisoned to make any new aspect of cataloging fit.)
>
>Cheryl
>
>
>
>Diane Hillman wrote:
>
>>
>>I think the other important reason for this kind of shift is that 
>>increasingly cataloging is not being done by professional 
>>librarians, but by staff trained in the mechanics, not the theory. 
>>The materials developed by the PCC and others are not necessarily 
>>designed just for librarians and don't generally rely on a good 
>>theoretical background to be useful--more a "rules and tools" 
>>approach.
>>
>>What I see happening is that even well-trained and experienced 
>>cataloging professionals are doing less cataloging, and more 
>>training, reviewing and management of increasingly complex 
>>cataloging operations, where "handmade" cataloging must play well 
>>with "industrial" cataloging from vendors and others. The people 
>>with the understanding of IO and retrieval gradually seem to get 
>>involved in project planning, web design, and other activities for 
>>which cataloging training is amazingly useful, but it cuts into the 
>>portion of their time when they're actually cataloging.
>>
>>
>>*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
>
>
>--
>Cheryl Boettcher Tarsala
>Adjunct Assistant Professor
>LEEP Program, Graduate School of Library and Information Science
>University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
>
>[log in to unmask]
>[log in to unmask]
>
>The views expressed here are my own and not those of UIUC or GSLIS.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
March 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
June 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
December 2007
November 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
April 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager