LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  July 2006

ARSCLIST July 2006

Subject:

Re: Longevity

From:

Goran Finnberg <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 4 Jul 2006 20:04:01 +0200

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (121 lines)

Tom Fine:

> Also, Goran brought up an important point. Some or 
> perhaps many SACD players do not output "pure" 
> DSD digital but rather convert to PCM and then D-A.

To clarify some 95 percent of about 30 so called SACD capable players
that I have looked at, the schematic in the service manual, were all
doing the down conversion of the SACD stream to regular 48/16 PCM.

Makes sense since they were also capable of playing normal CDs and since
most customers will never hear the miniscule difference between pure DSD
and regular CDs then it makes sense to use one conversion system, DAC,
to cut cost of the units.

Only pure SACD players in the top cost wise did use the pure DSD stream
for conversion into audio out.

> And, worse, many SACD's are made by converting a PCM file into
> DSD after all the workstation work is done. The reason being that,
> for instance in remixing a 24-track tape, the engineer is more 
> likely to want to work in the Protools format he's used to. 

Right.

> I think
> but do not know for a fact that companies like SADIE and Pyramix
> now make many-channel all-DSD workstations but I believe they are 
> expensive and few studios will go that route for a sinking format. 

Entirely correct in my experience.

Why invest in something costing a small fortune if the returns are small
indeed.

> I think but do not know for a fact that most new (ie
> not reissue/remix) SACD's are made all-DSD from the start.

This cannot be taken for granted.

A SACD disk may come from any available source including 44.1/16 if
thatīs the only thing available to the record company.

Itīs all about the content, ie music, and the carrier whether it is SACD
or 44.1/16 CD is of very little concern to anybody.

------------------------

Subject:Re: Noisy Input Device Chain? (PC Multitracking)
Date:Tue, 27 May 2003 02:46:05 -0400
From:"Tony Faulkner" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To:"HOW' DO YOU DO THAT?" <[log in to unmask]>

Dear Glenn,

You are on the button here.  There is one particular good selling 
and well received SACD with my name on the back as engineer, where I
know all the record company had in the control-room was a 44k1/20-bit
Genex hard-disk recorder and a 44k1 DAT for backup - nothing DSD, nor
high-speed pcm.  The release was made into an SACD because the
original CD got such nice notices in Japan.

Incidentally, I just had to do a CD compilation for one client three
weeks ago.  Four tracks were straight pcm from us, four tracks were 
DSD downsampled to 44k1 from another studio.  Some of the material
needed a bit of CEDAR ReTouch to get rid of audience noises.  When I
looked at the DSD originated downsampled material on the ReTouch 
screen, there was an obvious steep low-pass filter characteristic 
around 21kHz, and one load of random noise below it.  I guess it must
have been SBM'd - one noise-shape too far for me - the string sound 
had gone quite 'fizzy'.

Tony

GREEN ROOM PRODUCTIONS  LONDON  ENGLAND
tel: 01895 822771   mobile: 07884 232533
We are on the Web at: www.auracle.com/greenroom
Email: [log in to unmask]

Come to us for Premium Quality CD, CD-ROM, DVD and DVD-ROM Duplication
Audio Mastering with SADiE, Cedar and dCS technologies


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Glenn Meadows" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <Recipients of 'masteringhowto' suppressed>
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 5:46 AM
Subject: Re: Noisy Input Device Chain? (PC Multitracking)


> **  In Response to what Alan Silverman <[log in to unmask]> said on Tue, 27
May
> 2003 00:17:38 -0400
>
>
> > One of the best sounding modern jazz SACD's that I know of came 
> > from a 16-bit dat safety copy - the only master available.  Sorry,
> > can't name names.
>
> Like I've always said.  It Ain't the bits, it's the brains using the bits.
>
> -- 
> glenn

---------------------------

Brains.

-- 
Best,

Goran Finnberg
The Mastering Room AB
Goteborg
Sweden

E-mail: [log in to unmask]

Learn from the mistakes of others, you can never live long enough to
make them all yourself.    -   John Luther

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager