Okay, I have made that changed. Is there anywhere that we need to
publicize this revision of the criteria?
On Mon, 25 Sep 2006, [iso-8859-1] Håvard Hjulstad wrote:
> I assume that the message below pre-dates the latest version of the
> Criteria document, and that you have added the paragraph referring to
> 639-3. I think it is fine, but for formal reasons there should be a
> "warning" sentence, e.g. "ISO 639-3 is currently on final draft stage
> and is expected to be published as an International Standard soon. The
> current code table of ISO 639-3 is stabilized and may be used."
> Håvard Hjulstad
> mailto:[log in to unmask]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ISO 639 Joint Advisory Committee [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Rebecca S. Guenther
> Sent: Friday, September 22, 2006 3:28 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: please review
> Actually I think I need to add a word about individual languages that don't meet the 639-2 criteria being added to 639-3. I'm not sure how to word it since the maintenance agency for part 3 is not formally established. Suggestions are welcome.
> On Thu, 21 Sep 2006, Rebecca S. Guenther wrote:
> > I just posted the revised criteria based on document N55 at:
> > http://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/criteria2.html
> > Please send any corrections/changes.
> > Are there lists where we announce this sort of thing? We've talked
> > about an RSS feed and it's sort of in the works (although it never
> > seems to get
> > done)-- are there any others except for the iso639 one hosted in Denmark?
> > Rebecca