Ross Singer writes:
> Could APP not just be extended and namespace to meet your need?
> At least then, even if, yes, we're using some niche namespace for
> the specific functionality you mention here, it's built on a
> foundation that isn't so /totally/ library specific that others
> could pick it up and use it on top of their existing systems (or,
> at the mininum, the parts they support).
Hi, Ross. Out of interest, what makes you describe SRU as "library
I ask because that was a perception that we explicitly wanted to get
away from in moving from Z39.50 to SRU, and it's a bit dispiriting to
see how totally we failed :-)
/o ) \/ Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]> http://www.miketaylor.org.uk
)_v__/\ "Arboreality does not correlate with pelvis shape" is an
interesting conclusion, but it's hard to get a paper of more
than seven words out of it.