Mike Richter wrote:
> Poorly recorded discs are vastly more sensitive to failure over time
> than those recorded with low error rate. In an attempt
What do you consider to be low (or acceptable) C1 and C2 error rates?
I've been running CDSpeed on my discs, which appears to give a quality
score of "0" if there are any C2 errors at all.
Others, please feel free to chime in as well.
Project Archivist, Muskie Archives & Special Collections
70 Campus Avenue
Lewiston, ME 04240-6018