LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  December 2006

ARSCLIST December 2006

Subject:

Re: The ways CD's and DVD's can fail.

From:

Mike Richter <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 7 Dec 2006 07:41:25 -0800

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (61 lines)

Charles Lawson wrote:
> Ronald Frazier writes:
>> I honestly think the MAM-A Gold discs are the best in the world at this 
>> time
> 
> I, too, still have the best general results with these discs.  However,
> quality control on MAM-A gold discs continues to be an issue for me and
> the problem is growing worse.  I am now averaging five discs per pack of
> 25 that arrive with debris, fingerprints or oily smears on them when they
> come out of the shrink wrap.  I have begun a collection of bad discs to
> return to the factory.  The fingerprints should make tracking the careless
> party pretty simple...
> 
> Visually inspect all discs before you plop 'em in your drives...
> 
> Caveat emptor,
> 
> Chas.

My experience with faulty discs is almost exclusively due to attempts to 
rescue those sent or discussed by others. It appears that the most 
common reasons for disc failure are mishandling and poor original 
recording. In time, the instability of the dyes will come into play, but 
a well-recorded CD-R treated with reasonable care will surely last a 
decade and presumably many decades. I know that error rates do not 
increase noticeably over a decade because I have recordings I made in 
the early and mid 1990s which test today as they did when freshly 
burned: no recognizable increase in C2 errors.

Mishandling takes many forms. Solvent-based markers are known to leech 
through the acrylic lacquer atop the disc; the data lost cannot be 
recovered and often enough the disc will not stabilize in a drive to 
permit sector-level recovery. Some dyes - notably the cyanine and 
phthalocyanine which are otherwise desirable - are more sensitive to 
light and possibly to heat than others; exposing discs with them to 
sunlight for a few hours bleaches out the information. Scratches can 
also be significant, but if severe are easily buffed out.

Poorly recorded discs are vastly more sensitive to failure over time 
than those recorded with low error rate. In an attempt to get 'better' 
recordings, many are writing at speeds below the optimum for a given 
medium and drive with results as unsatisfying as writing above the 
'sweet spot'. For archiving, it seems to me essential that each batch of 
blanks be tested to determine optimum recording conditions and quality 
to be expected when they are used.

It is my advice to those seeking personal archives to consider practical 
issues such as those above before choosing to invest in high-price 
blanks. MAM-A gold may have better life under ideal conditions than a 
high-quality silver disc, but if it is not as well written in your 
drive, the advantage will be lost. At best, the improvement is not 
enough to take shortcuts in other aspects of good practice; one should 
still make two masters on different media to be stored separately. In 
the real world of finite resources, the choice of medium is only one 
factor in the expected life of an archived disc.

Mike
-- 
[log in to unmask]
http://www.mrichter.com/

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager