LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


[email protected]


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  January 2007

ARSCLIST January 2007

Subject:

Re: It Goes To 11...The Spinal Tap Philosophy.

From:

"Steven C. Barr(x)" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sun, 7 Jan 2007 00:24:58 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (190 lines)

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Aaron Levinson" <[log in to unmask]>
>
Let me inject another point...from experience! To some extent, the
"loudness wars," at least among rock guitarists, came about because
they were striving for certain levels of distortion...which is
achieved by turning amplifiers UP! (It can also be done, though
not as well, through the use of "effects pedals"). I attended many
an open-stage jam session with Jeff Healey in his "pre-star" days...
and he regularly used a Fender Twin, turned up until the amplifier
was appropriately overdriven and the requisite distortion was
achieved (and small animals were being driven against walls...)!

In fact, I owe my current partial deafness to too many years of
standing next to blues-rock guitarists with Twins or Marshalls
turned up to the proper distortion point...

Myself, I simplify things...I use a 5-watt tube amp, whose
appropriately overdriven output is then miked and fed to a
PA channel! Easier, and safer for my bandmates and/or the
audience!

In most cases, however, the offending musicians wear earplugs...
which protect HIS/HER/ITS hearing, but no-one's else...

Steven C. Barr
>
> Both you and Parker are both better versed in the nuances of exactly
> what is taking place in the Loudness Wars, the two of you are both
> gifted engineers and understand the specific deficiencies that the
> signal suffers from and the many sources from which these errors are
> introduced. I am not disagreeing with either of you on that level. I
> concede that big label's are guilty of fostering this problem and with
> your exact and funny"my Britney" reference. That is indeed the level of
> intelligence that we are dealing with here.
> But what I am saying is that just as the recorded signal is being
> deformed and to the detriment of all the music that is subjected to it,
> the Loudness obsession is originating from and being exacerbated by
> artists too and has been for a long, long time and offer you the
> historical evidence to make this claim:
>
>  *"It Goes To Eleven*"
>
> This reference is probably instanly understood by 90% of people on this
> list. It is the most famous line from the infamous rockumentary Spinal
> Tap. I think one of the reasons that film has become the enduring
> classic it has after 23 years is, in large measure due to its
> depressingly accurate diagnosis of what makes a rock band bad. Really
> bad. And I think that the funniness of that line is at heart its
> absolute truth. I found it telling that both Parker and the youtube
> video signaled out rock music specifically as the emblematic genre for
> the problem.  I know unequivocally at their core, many rock bands are
> obsessed with reaching 11 and have been since The Who. I think that the
> problem we are talking about has its roots as much in the musicians
> themselves, particularly in rock, where Credibility is still measured
> basically in decibels. I am respectfully submitting that while I don't
> deny the labels culpability I do think and have seen, from working with
> rock bands, that the unfortunate final result of "going to 11" is
> operating just as powerfully in the aesthetics of rock itself. You may
> still disagree with me and feel that the pressure really comes from Don
> Ienner or LA Reid or Lyor Cohen but I am equally convinced that Spinal
> Tap was utterly correct nearly in its characterization of Rock music and
> the Coolness of Loud. So, I'm just saying in this war we need to spread
> the blame around. I think that is probably a 50/50 tug in many cases
> from both sides, toward 11. As incredible as it seems,  /both/ sides of
> the /music business/ see the War as a win/win situation. I think all
> three of us agree that the quality of music we must endure after the
> Loudness Wars is pretty bleak. We live in a loud age, it is one the
> indisputable facts of modern times. It is a shame to me that art has
> been made banal and identical by competing in a shouting match, but in
> my view, the artists and the suits are sharing the Kool-Aid pretty
> fairly. That is my essential point.
>
>
>
>
>
> Tom Fine wrote:
> > Hi Aaron:
> >
> > I'm a fan of your work, and I think you'd sit there at a mastering
> > session and fight to preserve dynamics (and the mastering engineer, if
> > he's worth the space he's occupying, would agree with you anyway), but
> > the whole Loudness War thing is mostly the product of record company
> > hacks demanding "I want my Britney Spears wannabe to sound as loud as
> > their Britney Spears wannabe" and passive mastering engineers just
> > going along to cash the check and keep the client. Bob Orban, the
> > inventor of most of what is used on way out of an FM control room
> > today, wrote a detailed analysis of what radio stations should DEMAND
> > an end to the "wars" (see link below). Unfortunately, the same breed
> > of tool runs a typical ClearChannel region as runs a typical Big Music
> > A&R department today.
> >
> > Hey, kewl. I Googled "Orban loudness wars" and got ... me.
> >
> > Two good articles linked here. And, another in a long list of my
> > bitching about CD remastering "engineers".
> >
> > Tom Fine wrote:
> >
> >> Here's a link to the actual article in case you want to print for the
> >> files.
> >>
> >>
http://www.austin360.com/music/content/music/stories/xl/2006/09/28cover.html
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks Dave, this is a good presentation of a vexing self-inflicted
> >> wound.
> >>
> >> I think we've run this issue around, but that might be the Ampex
> >> list. For more perspective, see Bob
> >> Orban's excellent article:
> >>
http://www.orban.com/support/orban/techtopics/Appdx_Radio_Ready_The_Truth_1.3.pdf
> >>
> >> which shows that these over-loud CD's sound even worse after being
> >> put through FM processing.
> >>
> >> It's just disgraceful how 50 years of progress in sound recording and
> >> reproduction -- to where at
> >> least a few recordings each year were truly life-like -- is being
> >> erased in less than a generation.
> >>
> >> -- Tom Fine
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Parker Dinkins"
> > <[log in to unmask]>
> > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2007 6:44 PM
> > Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Libraries disposing of records
> >
> >
> >> on 1/6/07 5:02 PM US/Central, Aaron Levinson at
> >> [log in to unmask]
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> The Loudness War is
> >>> really the result of radio stations compressing things to death and to
> >>> place the blame on the labels alone is really just a facile answer to a
> >>> more complex problem.
> >>
> >> Well, we might disagree there.
> >>
> >> Most of the mastering sessions we do are attended, and most clients
> >> insist
> >> that their CDs be as loud as the one they bring with them for
> >> comparison,
> >> without regard to the preservation of transients.
> >>
> >> As for radio processing, see
> >> http://www.masterdigital.com/24bit/radioprocess.htm.
> >>
> >> What radio stations do is much more than compression. Few audio
> >> engineers
> >> have ever heard of phase rotation, yet virtually all audio you hear
> >> on the
> >> radio undergoes this process.
> >>
> >> Many years ago it was grounds for rejection at the CD pressing plant if
> >> there were too many 0dBfs samples in a row. Now, it's not uncommon to
> >> see 20
> >> or more in a row on commercially released product. And these CDs are
> >> being
> >> mastered by first tier mastering facilities, with international
> >> reputations,
> >> as well as in house mastering engineers at record labels.
> >>
> >> Instead of radio, many people think the loudness war in CDs was
> >> created by
> >> the CD changer.
> >>
> >> Nevertheless, radio processing is also driven by the quest for
> >> loudness, but
> >> rock CDs (for example) when broadcast are made much worse by being
> >> clipped
> >> during the mastering process.
> >>
> >> Radio processing lessens the level differences between various program
> >> sources; it doesn't increase it.
> >>
> >> -- 
> >> Parker Dinkins
> >> MasterDigital Corporation
> >> Audio Restoration + CD Mastering
> >> http://masterdigital.com
> >>
> >
>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager