LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


[email protected]


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  January 2007

ARSCLIST January 2007

Subject:

Re: Loudness, was Libraries disposing of records

From:

Scott Phillips <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sun, 7 Jan 2007 10:17:35 -0600

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (135 lines)

Thanks for reprinting this for everyone. 

It should be noted that exceeding the limits unintentionally produces
all sorts of problems on the transmission and/or interference with other
stations. Many receivers, particularly FM, have difficulties when
presented with excessive FM deviation from a transmission. For those
unfamiliar, deviation in FM is basically the bandwidth the signal
occupies. Excessive deviation by overmodulation means the station's
signal can expand in frequency enough to 'step on' the signal from
another station, among other things. The references to modulation over
100% may confuse some unfamiliar with the ins and outs of RF.... I can
see some folks wondering how you can actually have modulation exceeding
100% while still being technically undistorted. 

In AM transmission (amplitude modulation), 100% negative modulation
roughly means no output from the station at all, while 125% positive
modulation means the transmitter is being driven to a power level likely
outside the FCC license permission for that station. The coverage area
for any station is meant to never overlap that of another station on the
same frequency at a different location. Excess power used for any reason
is not allowed because of that. At he risk of going in the weeds
slightly, let me mention that this is also the reason stations may well
have a different licensed power for the daytime vs. the night time....

For TV, the audio is sitting right next to the video signal, and
excessive deviation will really cause a problem there if the two signals
collide...

Note the last item listed below: 

(c) If a limiting or compression amplifier is employed to maintain
modulation levels, precaution must be taken so as not to substantially
alter the dynamic characteristics of programs.

This has always been impossible to enforce, as subjective as it is, and
so the perceived need for stations to be as loud or louder as you tune
across the dial looking for your favorite music. Sad, really...


-----Original Message-----
From: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Parker Dinkins
Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2007 7:54 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Loudness, was Libraries disposing of records

on 1/6/07 9:24 PM US/Central, Scott Phillips at
[log in to unmask]
wrote:

> I have been in the recording industry in one way or another for years,

> but I also possess an FCC license that started out as a first class 
> license for radio, when they were 'hard to get'. Put bluntly, there 
> are legal restrictions that AM/FM broadcasters need to adhere to, and 
> they limit such things as dynamic range. They MUST have gear that 
> restrains/maintains things in those areas. They are NOT going away, 
> they can't. With that in mind, at the very least record 
> companies/producers/engineers/mastering engineers should understand 
> this. Radio CAN'T change this, it is the law. Sure, they have some 
> latitude as to how the gear is adjusted, but less than you might 
> imagine. Once it seemed like this was just common recording 
> engineering knowledge, I must be getting old...
> 
> As a result, they have to be pretty inflexible as to their processing.
> Sure, they also want to be the loudest station as you tune across the 
> dial in most cases... But that WILL happen, HAS happened for more 
> years than I've been alive. Still, they have more restrictions 
> actually placed on them that the rest of the recording chain. This was

> not true when vinyl was king, it was different but 'similar' in 
> discipline. If the industry was in fact recording and mastering to fit

> the needs of radio, it wouldn't sound like it does right now.

See (US only, of course)

FCC Rule [portions omitted for clarity]

73.1570 Modulation levels: AM, FM, and TV aural.

 (a) The percentage of modulation is to be maintained at as high a level
as is consistent with good quality of transmission and good broadcast
service, with maximum levels not to exceed the values specified in
paragraph (b). Generally, the modulation should not be less than 85% on
peaks of frequent recurrence, but where lower modulation levels may be
required to avoid objectionable loudness or to maintain the dynamic
range of the program material, the degree of modulation may be reduced
to whatever level is necessary for this purpose, even though under such
circumstances, the level may be substantially less than that which
produces peaks of frequent recurrence at a level of 85%.

 (b) Maximum modulation levels must meet the following limitations:

  (1) AM stations. In no case shall the amplitude modulation of the
carrier wave exceed 100% on negative peaks of frequent recurrence, or
125% on positive peaks at any time.

   (i) AM stations transmitting stereophonic programs not exceed the AM
maximum stereophonic transmission signal modulation specifications of
stereophonic system in use.

   (ii) [omitted for clarity]

  (2) FM stations. The total modulation must not exceed 100 percent on
peaks of frequent reoccurrence referenced to 75 kHz deviation. However,
stations providing subsidiary communications services using subcarriers
under provisions of Sec. 73.319 concurrently with the broadcasting of
stereophonic or monophonic programs may increase the peak modulation
deviation as
follows:

   (i) [omitted for clarity]

   (ii) In no event may the modulation of the carrier exceed 110 percent
(82.5 kHz peak deviation).

  (3) TV station. In no case shall the total modulation of the aural
carrier exceed 100% on peaks of frequent recurrence, unless some other
peak modulation level is specified in an instrument of authorization.

For monophonic transmissions, 100% modulation is defined as

<plus-minus>25 kHz.

 (c) If a limiting or compression amplifier is employed to maintain
modulation levels, precaution must be taken so as not to substantially
alter the dynamic characteristics of programs.

--
Parker Dinkins
MasterDigital Corporation
Audio Restoration + CD Mastering
http://masterdigital.com

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager