Thanks for your comments, Ruth. Would you care to comment further on why
Option 5 would suit scientific data archives?
National Library of Australia, Canberra ACT 2600 Australia
t: +61 2 6262 1381 e: [log in to unmask]
On Tue, 23 Jan 2007 11:14:00 -0700, Ruth Duerr <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>Of the options presented on the wiki, I think Option 5 would suit the
>needs of the scientific data archive best....
>On Jan 22, 2007, at 12:37 AM, Gerard Clifton wrote:
>> The PREMIS Editorial Committee has begun revision of the PREMIS Data
>> Dictionary for Preservation Metadata and its related XML schemas
>> and is
>> seeking feedback from the digital preservation community.
>> Comments and discussion are invited on proposed changes to the
>> units 'significantProperties' and 'preservationLevel'. Notes on a
>> number of
>> issues and suggested options for these semantic units are available
>> on the
>> PREMIS Implementors' Group wiki at:
>> Please send comments and suggestions to the PIG-list for further
>> The initial period for comment will end on Friday, February 2, 2007.
>> The full list of proposed changes will soon be made available via
>> the wiki
>> (see PREMIS Revisions at: http://pigpen.lib.uchicago.edu:8888/
>> Other topics for discussion will follow in due course.
>> With thanks,
>> The PREMIS Editorial Committee