Dr R. Sanderson writes:
>> Should have said:
>> 'exact' relation eliminated. Replaced by '=='.
> Oh, did we go with '==' in the end? Ignore my previous 'eq' message
> then :)
Did we really? Using "==" for this seems like a terrible mistake to
me, since in all other situations where both "=" and "==" are
ecognised with distinct meanings (C-influenced programming languages),
they are _not_ two different forms of equality comparison, but one is
an assignment operator. I think I would prefer the "eq" that Rob
thought we'd chosen.
/o ) \/ Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]> http://www.miketaylor.org.uk
)_v__/\ "The Bible is quite deeply rooted in our culture, and still
fairly important in some forms of Christianity. So maybe there
is something to be said for it" -- Andrew Rilstone.