Maybe instead of a $5 in 8XX for the institution to which the field
applies, we need a new subfield for the version to which the field
applies? Kind of like the $d that we have in the 6XX series authority
fields which encodes volumes/dates to which the data in the field applies.
Adam L. Schiff
University of Washington Libraries
Seattle, WA 98195-2900
(206) 685-8782 fax
[log in to unmask]
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007, Renette Davis wrote:
> So the questions for this group are:
> 3. If we define a $5 to the 8XX fields (as we just did for 533 and 538),
> would that make it more acceptable to add an 8XX for the series that applies
> only to the electronic version to the print version record?