On Thu, 2007-03-22 at 14:39 +0000, Mike Taylor wrote:
> Tor Arne Dahl writes:
>  > 2.  or be 
>  > published by the recipient of the query in some protocol dependent 
>  > fashion." Is the IndexInfo part of the Explain document such a mapping 
>  > "published by the recipient of the query in some protocol dependent 
>  > fashion"?
> Yes, precisely.  (In fact, AFAIK it's the _only_ such "protocol
> dependent fashion" -- that clause smells of over-generality to me.)

The only way for SRU, yes, but in Z39.50 it might be part of the Explain
operation, or perhaps part of the OpenSearch description file for that
protocol.

>  > 3. We want to publish the NorZIG context set when version 1.0 is
>  > ready.  This can be done by providing the information to the SRU
>  > maintenance agency, according to the website. Is there an official
>  > way to register the URI for the context set?
> Others will have to answer that, but may I just say that I'd love to
> see a situation where there is no need for a separate NorZIG set.

Yep :)  Unless there are NorZIG specific entries which don't make sense
outside of that context.


Rob