On Thu, 2007-03-22 at 14:39 +0000, Mike Taylor wrote:
> Tor Arne Dahl writes:
> > 2. or be
> > published by the recipient of the query in some protocol dependent
> > fashion." Is the IndexInfo part of the Explain document such a mapping
> > "published by the recipient of the query in some protocol dependent
> > fashion"?
> Yes, precisely. (In fact, AFAIK it's the _only_ such "protocol
> dependent fashion" -- that clause smells of over-generality to me.)
The only way for SRU, yes, but in Z39.50 it might be part of the Explain
operation, or perhaps part of the OpenSearch description file for that
> > 3. We want to publish the NorZIG context set when version 1.0 is
> > ready. This can be done by providing the information to the SRU
> > maintenance agency, according to the website. Is there an official
> > way to register the URI for the context set?
> Others will have to answer that, but may I just say that I'd love to
> see a situation where there is no need for a separate NorZIG set.
Yep :) Unless there are NorZIG specific entries which don't make sense
outside of that context.