LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  April 2007

ARSCLIST April 2007

Subject:

Re: Slides and inconvenient media

From:

George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sat, 7 Apr 2007 01:49:07 +0200

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (190 lines)

From: Patent Tactics, George Brock-Nannestad

Tom Fine described the virtues of PowerPoint, and it is a fabulously simple 
tool to work with. However, to someone taking extensive notes during 
presentations, there is one thing missing from almost all presentations, 
including my own: a sound to indicate that a new image is on the screen. With 
overhead projectors, there was the ruffling of transparencies to advertise 
that. With carousel slides (in the hall) there was the sound of the changing 
mechanism. In PowerPoint, a line of text my be all the difference there is 
between one screen and the next, but it means that the information is no 
longer there when you want to write it down. 

To save that sort of aggravation I would like to let people know when a 
revised image is on the screen. I have had no real success finding the 
information on the help menu, so I ask bluntly: do you know off-hand how to 
make a sound to indicate that the image changes?

A man in need, thanks beforehand,

all the best,

George

> This is oversimplistic. My company has put on industry conferences since its
> inception (1982). In 
> the time I've worked there (since 1993), we've evolved from sometimes
> type-written prepared speeches 
> with U-Matic tapes for ads or demonstration movies to now almost everyone
> using Powerpoint and 
> sometimes embedding WinMedia or Quicktime video. Just as 14 years ago, some
> presentations or deadly 
> boring and some are great. Almost no one does the stereotypical Powerpoint
> anymore, people are much 
> more creative than when it first started taking off. To keep people from
> glazing over, the spoken 
> part needs to be more focused and snappy than perhaps in the past, so that's
> a good thing. Also, we 
> find that people are making shorter presentations, about 20 minutes vs. 30
> minutes, and thus having 
> more time for Q&A which is what people really pay to see. As the person who
> has to create the 
> transcript CDR's, I am so happy for modern times that I can't even begin to
> describe it. The only 
> thing we need transcribed anymore is on-stage interviews and I can whip a
> CDR right together with a 
> folder full of Powerpoint files and a couple of Word documents. Furthermore,
> the ubiquitous use of 
> Powerpoint means more conference presentations are available online or are
> circulated widely so 
> there is a freer flow of information. How much of it is marketing hooey is
> another matter!
> 
> -- Tom Fine
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Roger and Allison Kulp" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 6:54 PM
> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Slides and inconvenient media
> 
> 
> > Research points the finger at PowerPoint
> >
> >
> >
> >    Email
> >   Print
> >   Normal font
> >   Large font
> >
> >  File photo: Do as I do ... the federal Treasurer, Peter Costelllo, shows
> the right way to give a 
> > PowerPoint presentation, speaking to graphs rather than reading dot
> points.
> >
> > Photo: Andrew Meares
> >
> >   AdvertisementAdvertisement
> >
> >     Anna Patty Education Editor
> > April 4, 2007
> >
> >
> >   If you have ever wondered why your eyes start glazing over as you read
> those dot points on the 
> > screen, as the same words are being spoken, take heart in knowing there is
> a scientific 
> > explanation.
> > It is more difficult to process information if it is coming at you in the
> written and spoken form 
> > at the same time.
> > The Australian researchers who made the findings may have pronounced the
> death of the PowerPoint 
> > presentation.
> > They have also challenged popular teaching methods, suggesting that
> teachers should focus more on 
> > giving students the answers, instead of asking them to solve problems on
> their own.
> > Pioneered at the University of NSW, the research shows the human brain
> processes and retains more 
> > information if it is digested in either its verbal or written form, but
> not both at the same time.
> > It also questions the wisdom of centuries-old habits, such as reading
> along with Bible passages, 
> > at the same time they are being read aloud in church. More of the passages
> would be understood and 
> > retained, the researchers suggest, if heard or read separately.
> > The findings show there are limits on the brain's capacity to process and
> retain information in 
> > short-term memory.
> > John Sweller, from the university's faculty of education, developed the
> "cognitive load theory".
> > "The use of the PowerPoint presentation has been a disaster," Professor
> Sweller said. "It should 
> > be ditched."
> > "It is effective to speak to a diagram, because it presents information in
> a different form. But 
> > it is not effective to speak the same words that are written, because it
> is putting too much load 
> > on the mind and decreases your ability to understand what is being
> presented."
> > The findings that challenge common teaching methods suggest that instead
> of asking students to 
> > solve problems on their own, teachers helped students more if they
> presented already solved 
> > problems.
> > "Looking at an already solved problem reduces the working memory load and
> allows you to learn. It 
> > means the next time you come across a problem like that, you have a better
> chance at solving it," 
> > Professor Sweller said.
> > The working memory was only effective in juggling two or three tasks at
> the same time, retaining 
> > them for a few seconds. When too many mental tasks were taken on some
> things were forgotten.
> >
> >
> http://www.smh.com.au/news/technology/powerpoint-presentations-a-disaster/20
> 07/04/03/1175366240499.html#
> > [log in to unmask] wrote: What about sound-slide shows?
> >
> > We have a number of presentations that used to be loaned out as  slide
> trays
> > with audio cassettes. Some also exist as dual trays and reel  tapes with
> cue
> > tracks for automatic slide advance and dissolve control.
> >
> > In the past they were transferred to VHS with a camcorder shooting a 
> screen.
> > Now the tapes are being copied to DVD with a Sony DVD recorder for
> > distribution to the few people who ask for them. Obviously the loss of
> quality  is
> > severe, but nobody seems to care.
> >
> > I would like to go back to the originals, to the extent that they exist,
> > scan the slides and transfer the tapes, but don't know what would be the
> most
> > practical means for presentation of the result. I've never seen a
> synchronized
> > sound slide presentation on a computer except some done at conferences
> as
> > QuickTime videos of a quality below that of VHS.
> >
> > Can PowerPoint do this?  How about other software that would  link good
> > resolution still images with a sound file or series of files? Has  anyone
> produced
> > HTML presentations in which a narration is presented by clicking  on an
> image
> > or with some kind of timing script?
> >
> > I would appreciate any links to such presentations on the net so I can
> see
> > how well they perform.
> >
> > Mike Csontos
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ************************************** See what's free at
> http://www.aol.com.
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > Don't be flakey. Get Yahoo! Mail for Mobile and
> > always stay connected to friends.
> > 

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager