LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for NLS-REPORTS Archives



[email protected]












By Topic:










By Author:











Monospaced Font





NLS-REPORTS  April 2007

NLS-REPORTS April 2007


Network Bulletin no. 07-24 (Digital Transition Advisory Committee-Digital transition issues identified and NLS responses)


NLSBPH <[log in to unmask]>


NLS Documents for Network Libraries <[log in to unmask]>


Mon, 30 Apr 2007 10:55:57 -0400





TEXT/PLAIN (366 lines)

Network Bulletin No.: 07-24

Date: April 27, 2007

Subject: Digital Transition Advisory Committee
Index term: Digital transition issues identified and NLS responses

Please find attached "Digital Transition Issues Identified," as mentioned in Network Bulletin 07-20, dated
April 6, 2007, which lists questions raised at the Digital Transition Advisory Committee meeting January
30-31 2007, along with NLS's responses.


For more information contact:

Carolyn Hoover Sung
Chief, Network Division
[log in to unmask]

 Digital Transition Issues Identified
 January 30 31, 2007

The Digital Transition Advisory Committee (DTAC) met at NLS January 30-31,
2007. The following is a list of questions, comments, and concerns expressed
by the group and NLS's responses.


DTAC: Librarians are concerned about rising labor costs.

NLS RESPONSE: Labor costs are related to either additional workload or
additional staffing. Beginning in 2008 NLS will provide fewer copies of books
to the network (analog and digital combined) than are now being produced on
cassette. Technical support for patrons using the download will remain the
responsibility of NLS through the transition years.

DTAC: Librarians are concerned about cost savings as they relate to long-term
space needs.

NLS RESPONSE: NLS understands this concern, but cautions that such
savings are five to ten years in the future, and actual savings may vary by

DTAC: As there are currently not enough resources to provide every network
library with multiple copies of the entire pre-2008 collection, librarians
suggest that NLS look at alternative ways to maximize access to the pre-2008
collection, approximately ten thousand analog-to-digital (A-to-D) titles and
eight thousand born-digital titles produced between 2003 and 2007.

NLS RESPONSE: NLS agrees to research solutions to maximize library access
to the pre-2008 collection. Possible solutions include:

Identifying changes needed to support shared resources of the
A-to-D collection and interlibrary loan between libraries.

Using the Multistate Centers (MSCs) as a safety net, to function as a
resource for less popular pre-2008 titles or possibly to house the entire pre-
2008 collection and circulate through interlibrary loan (ILL).

These and other alternatives will be investigated to determine which will work
best for patrons and the network.


DTAC: It was suggested that NLS put more than one book on a flash

NLS RESPONSE: NLS is committed to the policy of one book per cartridge.
DTAC: Reuse of cartridges by NLS is a shift in operations. Perhaps network
libraries could reuse cartridges for duplication, helping to alleviate the
shortage of books in the early years of the transition.

NLS RESPONSE: Actually, this is not a major change. It has always been
NLS's policy to redistribute needed books throughout the network then, if
unneeded, dispose of them. Now instead of recycling the books, they will be
returned to a central point(s) for reuse. NLS has never approved of
reduplication of NLS-produced books at the network level.

DTAC: Will there be a redistribution opportunity or just a recall of the flash

NLS RESPONSE: NLS is still considering whether to redistribute the books or
just recall them so the cartridges can be recycled.
DTAC: State librarians perceive an increase in cost to make up for the
shortage of flash cartridges.

NLS RESPONSE: This could occur in the early years of the transition.
However, once the transition is completed NLS will provide roughly the same
number of books in digital format that it provided on cassette.
When the on-demand centers become operational, network libraries will not
have to retain a copy of every digital book at their locations, as duplication
and circulation of many digital books will be the responsibility of the on-
demand centers.

DTAC: NLS should do a second production run of older titles when flash
cartridges are more affordable and high circulation books are identified.
NLS RESPONSE: NLS currently reissues books whose demand has remained
high and available copies have dropped or disappeared. This practice will

DTAC: What cataloging changes are needed to support collection sharing by
network libraries?

NLS RESPONSE: No cataloging changes will be required. If two or more
regional libraries were to agree to share a collection, the inventory function of
these libraries would need to be modified to identify which library holds which
part of the collection.

DTAC: Is the current ILL system robust enough to support higher volume?

NLS RESPONSE: Yes; however, if two or more libraries agreed to share
resources and used the same circulation system, the system might be
modified to request or send books seamlessly to patrons of the other library,
without using the electronic interlibrary loan form.

DTAC: There was a request for demonstrations of alternative shelving
systems such as the Texas shelving system and the New York City RL's
terminal digit shelving, as well as other alternative shelving techniques.

NLS RESPONSE: NLS will include programs on alternative shelving
techniques at the national conference in 2008 and attendees will have the
opportunity to observe firsthand how the Texas regional library handles
shelving. In the interim it should be noted that Mary Lamica, Consortium of
User Libraries (CUL) consultant, will give a PowerPoint presentation on
random access shelving at the Western/Midlands Conference in Scottsdale,
Arizona, in May 2007.

DTAC: It was suggested that magazines be distributed in digital format as
soon as possible because the navigation capabilities vastly improve their

NLS RESPONSE: NLS agrees. This will be done as soon as the cost allows.

DTAC: What are the implications for distribution of the MSC Quality Assurance
(QA) program magazines?

NLS RESPONSE: The current practice will continue until it becomes cost
effective to provide these magazines in a digital format.

DTAC: What are the implications for the local book recording program? When
will the NLS guidelines/specifications be available to support the QA program
voluntary evaluation at MSCE?

NLS RESPONSE: This document is currently being written and is expected to
be available by December 2007.
DTAC: Some patrons prefer having a bookcard rather than totally depending
on listening to the description of the book.
NLS RESPONSE: NLS will continue to provide bookcards with both cassette
and digital books.

DTAC: It was recommended that the network be allowed to reuse cartridges.

NLS RESPONSE: Current cost scenarios do not make this feasible. The issue
can be revisited if the overall cost of cartridges drops to an acceptable level.

DTAC: It was suggested that NLS keep continuity of format for books in a


DTAC: Will libraries need to keep one copy of each book?

NLS RESPONSE: NLS expects regional libraries to maintain at least one copy
of each title issued to the network in braille, recorded cassette, or digital

DTAC: Will network libraries need to purchase containers for locally produced

NLS RESPONSE: Yes; network libraries will also need to purchase flash
cartridges for local titles. NLS will identify sources of purchase for both
cartridges and containers.


DTAC: It was suggested that more photographs of the player and container be
made available for network library publications.

NLS RESPONSE: These will be provided when digital players become

DTAC: It was suggested that simpler descriptions of the transition be
published as the ones in Talking Book Topics and Braille Book Review are

NLS RESPONSE: NLS will look at this request to determine what, if anything,
can be done.

DTAC: We recommend that the minutes of this meeting be circulated to the

NLS RESPONSE: The minutes have been distributed to the network.

DTAC: Communication with readers should be expanded beyond the normal
channels to reach eligible users who are no longer frequent users.

NLS RESPONSE: NLS will investigate ways to do this.
DTAC: We recommend communication beyond the Flash newsletter with more
specific information about timing and the kinds of planning needed by
librarians and users. Please clarify that the digital players will not be in the
hands of all users or fully rolled out until 2010 or 2011. Many librarians and
readers actually expect all patrons to have players in 2008. Expectations may
need to be reduced.
NLS RESPONSE: NLS agrees with this assessment and will undertake steps
to address this concern.

DTAC: It was recommended that NLS start reducing expectations of the
availability of digital players in current NLS channels of communication and
then move to new channels.

NLS RESPONSE: This is a challenge. One of the ways to reduce expectations
will be to slow the promotion of the new format and to withhold promotional
materials on digital books until the number of books and players have reached a critical mass in network libraries. This will
not be easy as many libraries are already looking for ways to promote the new

DTAC: A listserv for the group may be a useful way to work on the more
practical transition implementation plan with a variety of sub-plans and time
lines. Also a special section of the network library web site could be dedicated
to the most current information on the implementation.

NLS RESPONSE: NLS agrees; and will establish a listserv for DTAC to
exchange ideas and concerns.


A number of questions and concerns were raised regarding the NLS download
project. Responses require further investigation. The questions concerning
the download project will be answered in a separate document that will be
distributed as soon as it is completed.

DTAC: It was mentioned that some libraries have not emphasized identifying
veterans to ensure that they receive preferential service.

NLS RESPONSE: By law veterans have preference for talking-book service.
Libraries signing machine-lending service agreements have committed to
ensuring that this is accomplished.

DTAC: Player distribution policies are to be developed and implemented
locally. Public Law 89-522 states that veterans must be given preference and
NLS recommends that 10-Squared Talking-Book Club members follow the
veterans in preference.

NLS RESPONSE: That is correct.
DTAC: Each regional library will need to establish a distribution priority policy
based on local library needs and patron preferences. Questions received by
NLS regarding a player-distribution policy will be referred to regional libraries.

NLS RESPONSE: NLS suggests that each regional library formalize its policy
by the end of calendar year 2007 and share the policy with its patrons once
digital players become available for distribution.

DTAC: We encourage network libraries to involve consumer advisory groups
in the formulation of these policies.


DTAC: Members of the committee noted that machine distribution is complex
and political and should be discussed among peers at regional conferences.
The conference representatives concurred.

NLS RESPONSE: NLS agrees and encourages the regions to include machine
distribution on agendas at the upcoming regional conferences.
DTAC: NLS should notify each library of its patrons who have volunteered to
participate in testing the player.

NLS RESPONSE: NLS will refer this information to appropriate MLAs.

DTAC: Some librarians indicated that they have already begun lists of patrons
requesting digital players.

NLS RESPONSE: This is good. NLS is not suggesting that the network
publicize its collection of patron requests, but that it retain names of patrons
and cross check for veterans' status and/or 10-Squared Club membership to
enable an MLA to begin issuing digital players immediately upon receipt.

DTAC: Is it true that subregional libraries will not get allotments of players as
was the case with the C-1?
NLS RESPONSE: It is expected that digital players will be distributed to MLAs
in the same way that cassette players were.

DTAC: NLS should consider a distribution process, other than on a monthly
basis if production, quality control, and libraries can accommodate a faster
player-distribution model.

NLS RESPONSE: This will be considered, but a number of factors come into
play not the least of which is the manufacturer's production capability and
the important quality assurance review that machines must pass before they
are accepted for distribution.

DTAC: Will the serial number indicate if the player is advanced or basic so
that it will be immediately apparent to library staff which type of player a
patron has?

NLS RESPONSE: Yes, the first character of the serial number will indicate
the type of machine. The current plan is to also encode the warranty
expiration month in the serial number, so that the library will know
immediately if a faulty machine should be returned to the manufacturer.
Thus the number "S 1209 12345" would indicate a standard player with a
warranty expiration at the end of December 2009, and it would be the
12,345th machine manufactured in that month's production.
DTAC: How will libraries determine who needs an advanced machine?

NLS RESPONSE: This is difficult to answer before there are actually any
machines available for readers to use. The current plan is that a standard
player will be issued to each reader unless the MLA knows of extenuating
circumstances that would suggest an advanced player as the more appropriate
choice. Once readers have received standard players, the MLA would be
expected to exchange a standard player for an advanced player if readers
indicate the standard player does not meet their reading needs.
DTAC: The group suggested that NLS give more thought to letting early
adopters purchase their own players.

NLS RESPONSE: This will be up to the MLA/library after they meet the needs
of veterans and 10-Squared Club members.

DTAC: NLS should have a procedure to inform librarians when aftermarket
players become available.

NLS RESPONSE: NLS will inform the network of the availability of
aftermarket players through Reference Section publications.

DTAC: NLS should advise readers of both options for buying a player and
receiving an NLS player.

NLS RESPONSE: See the response to the previous question.

DTAC: There is concern that it would be difficult and complex to advise
readers in making a decision to buy a player or wait for one to be issued.

NLS RESPONSE: NLS agrees. Concentration will be on providing digital
players to MLAs for assignment to readers. Decisions as to the
appropriateness of an aftermarket player must be up to the individual
considering the purchase of such a device.

DTAC: More concrete and reliable information on player production and
distribution will be needed before advising readers.


Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Search Archives

Search Archives

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997



CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager