On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 10:08 +0100, Mike Taylor wrote:
> Rob Sanderson writes:
> > Then we need to define a very thorough schema, or we'll constantly
> > be fielding requests: Can you just add <insert favourite metadata
> > field> please?
> Yes; but that's not the end of the world. We already do this for the
> various context sets, and in fact it's not a common or demanding
> Or we can explicitly allow the metadata schema to include extension
> elements from other namespaces.
I'd prefer this to be possible.
Also agree on the interoperability point, to a certain extent.
I'll try and convert rec1.1 context set into a schema later today for
perusal, as the current rec 1.0 based schema is awful.