Ok, please critique:
(Lot's of handwaving here though, for example, what namespace or schema to
use for the metadata. This assumes that the rec namespace is used.)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Taylor" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 10:53 AM
Subject: Re: Record Metadata Schema (was Re: "collection" context set)
> Ray Denenberg writes:
> > From: "Mike Taylor" <[log in to unmask]>
> > > Rob,
> > >
> > > It seems clear that what the world needs right now is not guidelines
> > > on how to make an extension that does this, but specifications for an
> > > actual extension that does what's needed. Could you please rustle
> > > something up? I'm sure it would only take you a few minutes, and it
> > > would (A) make Martin's life much easier; and (B) ensure that his
> > > implementation can interoperate with those that follow. (I can
> > > imagine adding support for this to Zebra.)
> > I think we pretty much have it. Rob said what to do in the response.
> > the request, an extension that will work exists:
> > http://www.loc.gov/standards/sru/accept.html
> > The identifier is: info:srw/1/accept-1.0
> > For SRU, use the parameter 'x-info-1-accept'
> Sounds good. So can we please have a single page explaining how to do
> this? If you'll make a first draft, I will be happy to critique it.
> (e.g. "Hey! This sucks!")
> _/|_ ___________________________________________________________________
> /o ) \/ Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
> )_v__/\ "It seems to be the word on the street that Hypsilophodontidae
> is paraphyletic" -- Pete Buchholz.