LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


[email protected]


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  May 2007

ARSCLIST May 2007

Subject:

Re: 'New' solution for stickey shed

From:

"[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 14 May 2007 13:08:20 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (87 lines)

Sorry:

Non-backcoated tape can suffer from binder hydrolysis. We have seen it many
times. It is less common than on backcoated tape, but it does occur. (Why
this may be so is a controversial topic for different thread)

As to whether a chemical solution might work; yes it is possible. There
can, however, be problems with this solution.

If one looks at the published chemistry of the hydrolysis problem, there is
a fairly obvious answer. When the long-chain molecules interact with
moisture, the hydrolysis reaction breaks the long-chain polymers into
short-chain, low-molecular-weight oligomers. The chemistry of the polymers
and the oligomers is different. We have identified chemicals that will
dissolve the short-chain oligomers but do not react with the polymers.
Since it is the short-chain oligomers that represent the "sticky-shed"
problem, if you remove them and leave only the long-chain polymers, the tape
will not be "sticky". Of course, we have also seen the removal of the
oligomers cause deformation of the tape surface. It depends on how badly
hydrolysed the tape is.

If one is just removing the offending oligomers, why then does the author of
the article find that his tapes seem to remain stable after the treatment?
One might expect that continued exposure would simply cause additional
hydrolysis of the remaining polymers. Well, looking at the chemistry again,
most early binders were made up of a combination of shorter-length and
longer-length polymers. The mix is dependent on who made the tape and the
quality control procedures. It is a lot more difficult (and expensive) to
make sure all of the binder is only the longer-length polymers. Testing has
shown that the longer the polymer, the more stable (resistant to
hydrolysis). Thus, if the shorter-length polymers in the binder hydrolyze,
and the resultant oligomers are chemically removed from the tape, what is
left is the longer-chain polymers that are more stable. These polymers can
still hydrolyze but, since they are more stable, it is possible that
reasonable storage might result in a tape that does not exhibit
"sticky-shed" even after many years.

As I stated earlier, the process could work and we have experimented with
similar procedures. We do not use these procedure, however, except in very
rare instances and only on small sections of tape. I don't know how many
tapes or variety of tapes the particular individual who wrote the article
has tested but, in some instances, the procedure can PERMANENTLY deform the
tape if the entire tape is treated. Warning: once you have used the
oligomer extraction method, you can't put the oligomers back in the tape if
you find out you extracted too much of the tape material.

Peter Brothers
SPECS BROS., LLC
973-777-5055
[log in to unmask]

Tape restoration and disaster recovery since 1983

Peter Brothers
SPECS BROS., LLC
973-777-5055
[log in to unmask]

Tape restoration and disaster recovery since 1983


-----Original Message-----
From: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of [log in to unmask]
Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2007 10:13 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] 'New' solution for stickey shed

So someone posted in a response that there is no
documented example of a non-back coated tape
exibiting sss.

Is this correct? I am sure I have some OR tapes that
have SSS and are not BC'd.

Joe Salerno
713-6688650
Industrial Video Services
http://joe.salerno.com

Konrad Strauss wrote:
> Don't know if anyone here frequents the TapeOp message board, but some may
> find this interesting.
>
> http://messageboard.tapeop.com/viewtopic.php?t=44638
>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager