LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  May 2007

ARSCLIST May 2007

Subject:

Re: Cedar

From:

Eric Jacobs <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Tue, 22 May 2007 08:59:45 -0700

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (153 lines)

You may want to check out the ELP Declicker. It was
engineered and manufactured by CEDAR for ELP and uses
the full CEDAR declickle algorithms. The difference
is that it doesn't give you access to all the declickle
algorithm parameters because it's targetted at the
consumer/listener market rather than for remastering,
but gives you plenty of control for real-time listening
purposes. It's simple to operate and the AD and DA
converters are very high quality for good sound.

The ELP Declicker may be just the tool for doing
real-time declicking of your radio program material.

Eric Jacobs

The Audio Archive
tel: 408.221.2128
fax: 408.549.9867
mailto:[log in to unmask]


-----Original Message-----
From: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
[mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Dismuke
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 7:08 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Cedar


--- Graham Newton <[log in to unmask]> wrote:


>
> I have the CEDAR Cambridge system which is their
> flagship system and use its
> processes on a daily basis. Unless you are doing
> noise reduction processing
> almost daily and have a lot of experience with it,
> there are many very subtle
> aspects that you will completely miss.

This brings up questions I have had about CEDAR
assuming that I would ever be able to cough up enough
money to acquire one.

I am most emphatically NOT an audio engineer or even
an audiophile. I present vintage recordings on my
Internet radio station and elsewhere on the Internet
so I have a need to be able to get them to sound as
good as I can. And many of my records are in very
much less than E condition.

Beyond the limitations of my technical skills and my
knowledge of audio in general from a highly technical
standpoint, another huge limitation I have is time.
Even if I had the skills and desire, I simply do not
have the free time to lavish large amounts of
attention in order to make a single given recording
sound its absolute possible best. For me, the trade
off between quality and quantity is a big factor.
Plus I am not selling my stuff for CD reissues and
such - I basically give it away for free.

That's my context. So here are my questions about
CEDAR.

My understanding is the Duo operates in "real time."
Does that mean I could actually use it in a "live"
setting and use it to spin 78 rpms on a radio
broadcast and get decent results? What sort of
learning curve is there for an intelligent novice to
be able to get merely satisfactory or better results?

If the same novice had Cambridge, could he get decent
results - or does its expanded capabilities actually
work to his disadvantage? My guess is Cambridge would
not be able to be used for live broadcasts - is that
correct?

Finally, I would be very interested if someone who had
knowledge with CEDAR and who has a spare moment to do
so could listen to the following 128 kpbs mp3s of
records in various conditions processed using my
current equipment and let me know to what degree I
could get better results from CEDAR so I have an idea
whether or not it would be worth such a large
investment.

What I am currently using is a combination of KAB's
Souvenir VSP real time audio restoration for my
transfers plus a very light application of noise
reduction with DCart 6. (My results with DCart alone
without the Souvenir VSP have been on balance pretty
horrid). All of the recordings here were transferred
with a 3.3 TE styli.

Here is what I just won on the most recent Nauck
auction. The record is listed in E minus condition -
but since it has some silent and quite passages, there
is still some surface noise to it. I am sure someone
who is skilled with CEDAR could get better results
with the very small amount of noise that remains - but
could someone such as myself? To me, the results
sound good - but then again my ear is not especially
tranined. The amount of time I spent on this one was
approximiately two minutes over what it took to
transfer the recording.

http://www.radiodismuke.com/arsclist/dismukeone.mp3
(Marek Weber Orch - Potpourri of Popular Songs from
UFA Films Part 1)

Here is another recording in approximately E condition
but which does not have any really quite passages and
thus much less surface noise - and I probably could
have gotten away with using heavier noise reduction
than I did on it. Again, I perhaps spent two minutes
on this beyond the time it took to transfer. Would
CEDAR be able to give me improvement enough to justify
the cost?
http://www.radiodismuke.com/arsclist/dismuketwo.mp3
(Johnny Hamp Orch - I Can't Write The Words)

Here is a record that is in merely average condition
and was fairly noisy. I have no doubt that a pro on
CEDAR oould get much better results. But could a
novice such as myself? Again, I spent perhaps two
minutes on this beyond the time it took to transfer.
Could I get away with the same time investment with
CEDAR - and, if so, for how much improvement:

http://www.radiodismuke.com/arsclist/dismukethree.mp3
(Lou Gold Orch - Smile While The Clouds Are Gray"

Finally, here is a record that was in almost trashed
out condition - and I had to spend perhaps 15 or 20
minutes struggling to get it to sound to the degree as
I managed to get it. Could CEDAR have worked some
sort of miracle on a record such as this - and could a
novice such as myself have a chance of getting better
results with a similar or smaller time investment?

http://www.radiodismuke.com/arsclist/dismukefour.mp3
(Fred Gardner's Texas University Serenaders - Loveless
Love)

The Souvenir VSP and the software combined cost me
well under $1,000 - so cost difference is definitely a
factor that must be weighed.


 

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager