I'll claim that.
I certainly wouldn't want to try to display a record which was natively
in (say) SVG in a record metadata schema... I'd want to display the
metadata about that record in that schema.
On Tue, 8 May 2007, LeVan,Ralph wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: SRU (Search and Retrieve Via URL) Implementors
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>> On Behalf Of Ray Denenberg
>> Two. If you list marcXML in explain as a supported record schema, but
>> only support one of these, similarly you need a way to distinguish,
>> similarly, assigning distinct identifiers is a clear and painess way.
> But you clearly support both schemas for your records, so they should
> both be listed in the explain record.
> Are you claiming that there are schemas that you would use for metadata
> that you couldn't use for the data itself?