M'lud, I move that this message be stricken from the record.

Theo van Veen writes:
 > At KB we use a multi-format database where there can be more blocks of
 > data for each record, depending on the collection. We use the
 > recordSchema parameter to request a number of recordSchema's in a single
 > response. For example "recordSchema=DCX+MARC21" or
 > "recordSchema=DCX+ADMIN". 
 > This can also be use to request record data. Maybe this would be an
 > option.
 > 
 > Theo
 > 
 > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
 > Van: SRU (Search and Retrieve Via URL) Implementors [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
 > Namens Ray Denenberg
 > Verzonden: woensdag 2 mei 2007 22:45
 > Aan: [log in to unmask]
 > Onderwerp: Re: Record Metadata Schema &x-info-99-metadata=true
 > 
 > Getting back to this.....
 > 
 > Where we left off:
 > We want to define an extension, whose name would look something like:
 >             x-info-99-metadata
 > 
 > So the parameter in the SRU request would look something like:
 >               &x-info-99-metadata=[some value]
 > 
 > (We have ruled out the more elegant but also more shaky alternative of
 > omitting the value altogether, i.e.  "&x-info-99-metadata".)
 > 
 > One suggestion was:
 >       &x-info-99-metadata=true
 > 
 > I suggest instead that we maintain a list of reserved values.
 > 
 > So the parameter could look like:
 > 
 >            &x-info-99-metadata=rec
 > or
 >            &x-info-99-metadata=dc
 > etc.
 > 
 > How does that sound?
 > 
 > --Ray
 >