Mr. Ralph -- are you there? Do you have a position on this? --Ray
-----Original Message-----
From: SRU (Search and Retrieve Via URL) Implementors [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
Behalf Of Mike Taylor
Sent: Saturday, May 05, 2007 9:31 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Record Metadata Schema (was Re: "collection" context set)
Ray Denenberg writes:
> Mike - Suppose we use your approach (valueless extension where > 'rec'
is always implied) and along comes a LOM implementor who > wants a way to
include record metadata using the LOMAM (LOM > administrative metadata)
schema. What do we tell them?
"In SRU, record metadata is expressed using the REC schema, and that's what
you can get returned along with the record. If you really need it in LOM
format, you can either massage it on the client side, or request a LOM
record using the usual retrieval facilities."
_/|_ ___________________________________________________________________
/o ) \/ Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]> http://www.miketaylor.org.uk
)_v__/\ "I like your, 'ow you say, imperturbable perspicacity" -- Steven
Sondheim, "Come Play Wiz Me"
|