<configInfo>
<supports type="extension">
info:srw/extensions/1/recordMetadata-1.0</supports>
...
</configInfo>
R
On Tue, 22 May 2007, Ray Denenberg wrote:
> (Ralph, I can add a word or two about explain implications. But (I'm
> embarassed to say) I can't find an explain schema. Where is it? It seems
> to me that the schema does not provide support to list supported extensions,
> but I'm not sure about that. )
>
> --Ray
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "LeVan,Ralph" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 3:56 PM
> Subject: Re: Revised record metadata proposal
>
>
> This looks fine to me Ray. I'd like to see some discussion of the
> Explain implications for implementors of the extension.
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> Ralph
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: SRU (Search and Retrieve Via URL) Implementors
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress
> Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 2:11 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Revised record metadata proposal
>
>
>
> I have revised the record metadata proposal:
>
> http://www.loc.gov/standards/sru/metadata.html
>
>
>
> Notes:
>
>
>
> - This references a new record metadata schema, called "rmd". We
> decided during this discussion that "rec" was a misleading name, so I
> renamed it. It can be based on rec or rewritten. We'll discuss this
> among the Ed. Board.
>
>
>
> - This page describes both how to retrieve record metadata the
> "conventional" way, and by extension, as we discussed. The
> "conventional" discussion is included for completeness.
>
>
>
> - Two extensions are defined. One is the simple extension with no
> parameter value that assumes the default schema (rmd) and the second
> allows a schema name to be supplied. This is a compromise, as it is
> clear that there are two postions on this and that the advocates on both
> sides are pretty well dug in. In any case there is a justification
> supplied for two extension ("Reason for two extentions") which I think
> makes a compelling argument.
>
>
>
> --Ray
>
|