From: SRU (Search and Retrieve Via URL) Implementors [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
Behalf Of Mike Taylor
>It sounds the same as it did the last time we went round this subject
Not really. In fact not at all. Then, we were talking about allowing an
arbitrary schema id. Here were talking about a controlled list (tightly
Your approach would be to name a well known schema? What would that be, Rec?
So what happens the first time someone asks for the capability to do this by
some other schema? We define a new extension, similar to this one, for that
schema. That's not good for interoperability either.