LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  July 2007

ARSCLIST July 2007

Subject:

Re: Faceless Downloads = More Live Music?

From:

"Steven C. Barr(x)" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 17 Jul 2007 00:17:51 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (127 lines)

see end...
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Gary Atkinson" <[log in to unmask]>
> Here in the U.K. it was commented only last week that audience attendance
> to live performances, in particular music, is on a definite up.
> This is hardly surprising, as far as pop and rock is concerned. Though CD
> sales are down in the U.K. by between 10% to 8% compared to twelve months
> ago, depending on whose report one takes notice of, the teenagers to thirty
> year olds appear to be listening to more music than ever. Downloads,
> Streaming, MySpace, Peer-to-Peer, YouTube, MTV, Internet Radio, Ipods,
> Iphone, Ringtones, it's endless. People now walk and jog around with
> hundreds, if not thousands, of tracks neatly concealed in their pockets.
> Imagine the scene of someone walking into his friends living room and the
> host proudly saying "So, what do you think to my music collection.
> Impressive, eh?" as he points to his computer in the corner of the room.
> 
> Born in the mid fifties, I suppose I am part of the vinyl generation. The
> choice of format that would be yours to collect was... vinyl. And as a kid
> or teenager, if you could be bothered, there were spool tapes. Not many
> bothered. The way to  find out about the artists that one was hearing and
> get and idea what the faces were behind their music were limited. By the
> late 60s there was a thriving music press. Here, we had the all important
> "Top of The Pops" which has since being woefully been axed by the BBC and in
> the 70s there was the good old "Old Grey Whistle Test" also on the BBC.
> There was that wonderful listening experience of hearing a record for the
> first time, either on the radio or TV, or, perhaps at a friends house, which
> gave an incredible sensory rush coupled with the thought of 'My God, I've
> never heard anything so fantastic, what shall I do, what shall I do?' Before
> anything else in life was attended to, everything, no matter how important,
> had to be put on hold until the record was bought, taken back to the family
> home and smuggled through parents customs "What have you been buying dear?"
> And up, past the gun towers and beyond the razor wire of parental opinion
> and at last to the safety of one's bedroom.
> Undoubtedly the best format was the LP. What, for me, would usually be an
> hours tedious bus ride from town would turn into an experience like being
> gently transported to Heaven as I would sit, staring at the perfectly sized
> 12" x 12" cover, then the back, then the cover, then the back, then the
> cover, then the back, then the cover then the back... Reading everything;
> sleeve notes if any, track list, artists, instrument, engineers producers,
> equipment, cover artist. Everything, even down to who the printer was. Names
> and fact would be mentally stored and the discussed with friends at a later
> point.
> The LP, along with it's sleeve, art, photographs and printed words was
> highly visible and tangible. It was bought and it was owned. It physically
> represented the band or artist. You were looking at and holding exactly what
> the artist had held, excitedly, when it came off the press. You owned part
> of what they had produced and there it was for you and everyone else to see.
> On your shelf was part of there project.
> 
> I would like to say that the CD has carried on that tradition. Since their
> inception there have been some incredible attempts to make this format do
> the same as what the LP did. But it's problem is exactly what it set out to
> be...compact, small and indestructible. It is its strength and weakness. As
> I write this I have CD's lying around on my desk. 'Oscar Woods & Black Ace'
> and my favourite band from near by Manchester 'The Fall'. I would never,
> Never, NEVER leave LPs lying around. Never! Because LPs were, like the
> artists, are venerable, could easily be damaged and needed looking after.
> 
> I'm not a teenager anymore. Only partly. And although I have a fourteen year
> old son living with me, I don't pretend to know exactly how the download or
> Mp3 thrills a kid. I think that I would be right in saying it would not
> compare with the experience of hearing a record and then having to rush out
> like a man possessed and buy it, as described above. In addition, the music
> press is in decline and though there are the visuals on on-line mags, blogs
> and YouTube, is it really the same? Certainly, many of the well known and
> respected music critics here feel that they are not.
> Visually, a download is no more than an icon with a title, in a file.  So, I
> am not surprised to hear that live music is on the up both on a local pub /
> club level and on the larger, festival scale. There is no shortage of music
> and the way of accessing it seems to increase by the month. But people and
> in particular the younger generations, are no different now to how they have
> always been in as much as they want to see their music heroes,
> understandably now more than for a long time, or at least check them out
> before being awarded such status.
> 
> My son and I were chatting. I think it was about an early encounter with
> "girl trouble". His, not mine. My advice, gleaned from experience, seemed to
> be hitting all of the right buttons and I congratulated myself on being the
> wise father that I was proving myself to be. At the end of the discussion I
> suggested that he might ask the girl in question if she would like to go to
> the cinema or the disco. At this point he fell about laughing "Disco!!" he
> said. "There's no such thing as disco these days". Being aware that my
> apparent wisdom was falling into the icy waters of incredibility like the
> melting ice of the north pole, I said "Well, what do the kids do then?" He
> exclaimed "Gigs!!! They go and watch bands."
> 
This may well be true "On your side of the pond" but is very definitely NOT
true here in North America! Here, the "dance clubs" still rule...usually
playing what is now called "Urban Music," bit is better known as Hip-Hop or
Rap (or the vast collection of applicable sub-genres that come and go...!).
This music is set the the same beat that was once the specialty of James
Brown...but later was called "Soul Music" and then "Disco." Such live
music as still exists (excepting major shows by "name acts...)is, for the
most part, aimed at middle-aged "baby boomers"...and can be anything from
"blues bands" (mostly playing the "rock blues" of the sixties...to 
"tribute bands" (which learn note-for-note versions of vintage hits, and
play for the folks who still remember those acts...!)...to, on occasion,
shows by "The Original <whomevers>," which usually feature a couple of
the original group members...grey of hair and wrinkled of mien...with
younger "fill-ins" completing the original musical line-up. In fact,
modern-day nostalgia has inspired any number of groups to re-unite
(or as close as they can come thereto...)...!

The remainder of "live music" is provided by very new and very young
bands, playing for minimal pay (mainly because they WILL, since they
think that once their dubious talents receive public attention, it
will only be a very short time before they are "rock heroes/heroines"
known throughout the world...!

Finally, there are a very few bands who still play pre-rock'n'roll
music..."swing revival" bands and "dixieland" bands. In most cases,
these are groups of rather elderly musicians, still playing the same
music (often in the same beer joint[s]...!) as always...because they
enjoy the stuff (as do their ever-sparser audiences, usually of the
same age group as the players...!)

Of course, here in Ontario these tendencies are also brought about
by strict liquor-licensing laws (those under 19 can't get into
licensed rooms) as well as recent anti-smoking laws that make tobacco
use illegal in about 99% of enclosed venues...!

If I could find paying opportunities to play the blues music I love,
I should be very happy (and wouldn't worry too much about minor
details like rates...!)

Steven C. Barr

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager