LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


[email protected]


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  August 2007

ARSCLIST August 2007

Subject:

Re: ASCAP follows RIAA down the road guaranteed not to make friends

From:

Dismuke <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 2 Aug 2007 00:27:13 -0700

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (91 lines)

I am afraid that I am going to have to defend ASCAP on
this.

First off, if one believes in the concept of
performance royalties - well, then it follows that
there needs to be some method of enforcing them. 
Otherwise, organizations such as ASCAP become little
more than a voluntary "tipping jar" for those who wish
to do something nice for composers.

Second, ASCAP hardly uses the tactics of the RIAA
which goes after and targets people whose names they
do not even know on nothing more than an IP address. 
ASCAP does not drag people into court, and, when it
discovers that the defendant could not possibly have
been the one who was using the IP address to download,
simply asks that the case be dismissed in such a way
that leaves the innocent defendant on the hook for
thousands of dollars of legal bills and no way to sue
to get them back.

According to the ASCAP press release, the bars were
contacted by ASCAP ahead of time and were given
opportunities to come into compliance.

I agree that ASCAP's attempts in the past to shake
down businesses for the radios their employees listen
to on the job was absurd and abusive.  But a bar IS an
establishment that one can make a very strong case for
saying that it is profiting from the performance of
copyrighted music.  My guess is music is a major
element of how such bars define what they are all
about.

Furthermore, at least in the areas I have looked into
it, ASCAP rates are not especially expensive.  Of
course, as a webcaster, the area I am most familiar
with is the rates for Internet broadcasters.  My
royalties at present are covered by my service
providers.  But if I were to go it alone, my ASCAP
rate for Radio Dismuke would be $288 per year which
works out to $24 per month.  Based on their
methodology, my rate actually would be MUCH less - but
$288 is their annual minimum.  To the best of my
knowledge, I do not play any BMI or SESAC recordings. 
By contrast, under the pending SoundExchange rate
increase for sound recording royalties, a station with
an audience of similar size as mine that plays on
average 19 recordings per hour as mine does, during
2010, the last year of the new rates, the
SoundExchange royalties would be about $1083 per MONTH
for a station that already has a negative cash flow.

Finally, ASCAP regards royalties as a means collecting
revenues for its members.  It does not seek to drive
those who pay royalties out of business because that
would be contrary to its memberships' interests.  By
contrast, SoundExchange is controlled by and seeks to
promote the interests of the RIAA and regards
royalties as a means of driving broadcasters who
promote non-RIAA artists and non-RIAA approved formats
out of business in order to neutralize and marginalize
their emerging competitors.

Bottom line, compared with a certain other royalty
collection agency, ASCAP is civilized, friendly,
reasonable and affordable.




--- Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> http://tinyurl.com/3bzguo
> 
> I'd love to know what genius lawyer came up with
> this tactic, especially since it's backfired in 
> spades against the RIAA. Keep it up and even
> grandmas will feel it's OK to stiff "those jerks"
> and 
> steal music. How deep do these fools think a
> bar-owners pockets are? If they get back enough
> money 
> to feed one musician for one month, I'll be
> surprised.
> 
> One man's opinion, etc.
> 
> -- Tom Fine 
> 

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager