Interesting one. I _think_ that the ZeeRex fragment you included
below is Just Plain Wrong, and that you can't have the same index name
occurring within two <map>s, but that's really a question for Rob
Sanderson, who led the ANSI/NISO-Z39.92 standardisation of ZeeRex.

Rob?

 _/|_ ___________________________________________________________________
/o ) \/ Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]> http://www.miketaylor.org.uk
)_v__/\ "Unhappily, it coincided with Gascoigne attempting to set fire
to best friend Jimmy 'Five Bellies' Gardner's nose in a Newcastle
nightclub" -- The Guardian, 13th September 1998



Roger Wallin writes:
 > Thanks for the answer,
 >
 > before I continue, you should know that I have just started to work with
 > these concepts so there could be really easy answers, as I haven't
 > necessarily yet understood the whole concept.
 >
 > So concerning "DC.identifier" I should just make an assumption that it
 > searches in some of the server indexes (chosen by us) and there doesn't
 > have to be any descriptions, at least none standardized description of
 > this assumption?
 >
 > I have been told to use the XML below, but isn't this wrong as it says
 > that "DC.identifier" is the same as ISBN and ISSN, and those are actually
 > completely different indexes?
 > Or does it say that searching for DC.identifier the access point is both
 > ISBN and ISSN?
 >
 > I'm probably thinking too mathematical....
 >
 > Regards RogerW.
 >
 >
 > <index id="7">
 > <title>isbn</title>
 > <map>
 > <name>isbn</name>
 > </map>
 > <map>
 > <name set="bath">isbn</name>
 > </map>
 > <map>
 > <name set="DC">identifier</name>
 > </map>
 > </index>
 > <index id="8">
 > <title>issn</title>
 > <map>
 > <name>issn</name>
 > </map>
 > <map>
 > <name set="bath">issn</name>
 > </map>
 > <map>
 > <name set="DC">identifier</name>
 > </map>
 > </index>