Adam-- Rather than new ... I think that this is probably really OLD.
It probably just fell through the cracks a long time ago.
Adam L. Schiff wrote:
> I found a 667 MESSAGE note in a name authority record that I've never
> seen before.
> In record n 2002012624:
> 667 MESSAGE. Record reported for deletion. See no 97060315
> I haven't seen anything telling us to put this kind of MESSAGE note
> into records that we are reporting for deletion. I checked the DCM Z1
> 667 pages that talk about MESSAGE notes, and they don't provide
> instructions on this either. Is this a new practice that we should be
> following to alert others that an NAR is being cancelled?
> Adam L. Schiff
> Principal Cataloger
> University of Washington Libraries
> Box 352900
> Seattle, WA 98195-2900
> (206) 543-8409
> (206) 685-8782 fax
> [log in to unmask]
Richard C. Amelung, Ph. D.
Professor of Legal Research
Saint Louis University Law Library