Please see answers below.
At 07:40 PM 11/1/2007, Russell D. James wrote:
>So answers to my initial question bring up another query from me. Just what
>is the difference in operation between the two schema and which one is used
>more often than the other?
Relax NG is an ISO standard and W3C Schema as it name indicates is a
W3C recommendation. Though they largely support the same objectives,
the two schema standards do reflect some major theoretical
differences. These are quite complex. The O'Reilly publication Relax
NG by <http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/853>Eric van der Vlist covers
the differences in detail.
> Is there a preference? Why two different
The EAD Schema WG chose to issue the EAD schema in both languages to
offer a choice to the user community. Both enforce the same set of
semantic and structural constraints. For schema maintenance purposes,
the EAD Schema WG chose Relax NG because it is, in the view of the
technical editor, more elegant and straightforward than W3C schema.
Transformation from one to the other is possible provided one avoids
certain features in Relax NG that are either not supported or well
supported by W3C Schema.
As for which to prefer in deployment, you will find more software
support for W3C than Relax NG.
>Russell D. James, CA
>[log in to unmask]
Daniel V. Pitti, Associate Director
Institute for Advanced Technology in the Humanities
319 Alderman Library
P.O. Box 400115
University of Virginia
Charlottesville, Virginia 22904-4115